Midwestern Cities Race to Adopt, and Grow, Bike-Share

Pittsburgh was the newest city to announce its bike-share plans this week, when it confirmed the city would add a 500-bike system by the spring of next year.

Kansas City was one of the first cities in the Midwest to launch a bike-share system, when it did so last summer. But soon it will have plenty of company. Image: ##http://mobikefed.org/2012/12/kansas-citys-b-cycle-bike-sharing-system-wraps-successful-first-year## Missouri Bicycle Federation##

But nearby Columbus, Ohio, will beat them to the punch. Ohio’s capital city is planning to add 300 bikes this summer. Meanwhile, Indianapolis’ plan was to roll out its system next month.

The truth is you would be hard-pressed to find a large Midwestern city that hasn’t taken formal steps toward adding a bike-share system.

Both Cleveland and Detroit are studying bike-share. Cincinnati completed a bike-share study late last year, and is now seeking proposals from contractors. Milwaukee is assembling money for a system. Chicago hopes to add 3,000 bikes this spring.

And of course there’s the grandaddy of them all: Minneapolis’ Nice Ride. Launched in 2010, this system currently boasts more than 1,200 bikes. Late last year, the system surpassed half a million trips.

Midwestern cities have been inspired by some of the more spectacular examples on the coasts, according to Eric Rogers, executive director of BikeWalkKC, the nonprofit organization that manages Kansas City’s bike-share system. Kansas City was a little ahead of the pack when it launched Kansas City B-Cycle, with 200 bikes at 12 stations, last summer.

“The last few years a lot of cities, especially in the Midwest, have seen good examples from places like Chicago and Portland and New York and D.C. of a lot of innovative facilities that are out there: cycle tracks, bike boxes, bike-sharing,” he said. “There’s so much more knowledge out there now that it’s easier to develop a solution and pursue it.”

Midwestern metros have also been lured by the availability of new technology and the assistance of companies like B-Cycle and Alta Bikes that make installing these systems relatively easy and affordable. But these new additions to the bike-share family have taken a markedly different approach than some large coastal cities.

Midwestern systems tend to be smaller and more conservative than those in major metros outside the region.

Minneapolis' Nice Ride was the Midwest's pioneering system, but the region is adopting bike-share quickly. Image: ##http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2012/08/nice_ride_hits_500000th_trip.php## City Pages##

“A lot of the Midwest cities started kind of small, maybe with 10 or 12 stations, and they’re growing more organically over time,” Rogers said. “It seems like a lot of the larger coastal cities have taken more of a big-bang approach.”

Washington, D.C.’s first SmartBike system failed precisely because of its small size. The city decided that a bike-share system needed to be big enough to be useful right from the get-go, and the phenomenal success of Capital Bikeshare has proven that they were on to something.

Meanwhile, Kansas City’s start-small approach seems to be going as planned. BikeWalkKC got some additional federal air quality money to expand its system with eight stations this year, which will bring the citywide total to 20.

Rogers says operating a successful system in the Midwest comes with its own challenges. Midwestern cities typically aren’t as densely populated as some larger coastal metros. They may also lack transit that facilitates bicycling, and especially bike-sharing.

“There’s some pretty clear data that shows there’s more [bike-share] usage in a denser city,” he said.

Kansas City was surprised, for example, to see far more leisure-time trips than commuting trips. Evenings, lunchtimes and weekends are the most popular times for bike rentals there. Special downtown events also lead to a spike in usage. The organization has tailored its marketing toward this crowd, Rogers said.

One big question that remains is whether Midwestern systems will ever be financially self-supporting, as Washington D.C.’s Capital Bikeshare is becoming. The other question is whether that really matters.

8 thoughts on Midwestern Cities Race to Adopt, and Grow, Bike-Share

  1. Most of the bike sharing programs I’ve come across have two big problems:

    1. Only putting bikes in one part of the city. Not really much use if you have to go way out of your way to get and return the bike.

    2. Tourist-unfriendly rules and instructions. I’m sure this is intentional (there’s money to be made gouging tourists on transit, obviously.)  But on a personal level I find it aggravating as a tourist when I can’t use bike shares because the directions are only in other languages or a local ID is required.

  2. Except Mpls was well ahead of other cities including those on the coasts (I thought you were progressive?) and Chicago. Although to be fair, many Midwestern cities are being very boastful for being late to the table yet again.

  3. Anything B-cycle does is a guaranteed success. 

    However, look at Tampa which is first major market to eschew the expensive, inflexible “smart-dock” (CaBi) and select the more cost effective “smart-lock” of SoBi.  Just like the CD-ROM replaced the floppy, the “smart-lock” will replace the “smart-dock.”

    A shift to “smart-lock” will mean more bikes.


  4. There was talk a year or so ago about bikeshare in Grand Forks, North Dakota.  The boathouse project is also going to supply bicycle rentals on our Greenway, so hopefully this will drive tourism traffic (and give us the problem of “not enough bicycles for people”).

  5. Growing up in the Twin Cities and now living in DC, I am a member of both Niceride and CaBi. Outside visitors really pay for these systems, i.e. convention goers and tourists. Niceride in Minneapolis/Saint Paul would have higher ridership if the systems were not mothballed for 5 months due to our awesome winters. Plows and salt would greatly reduce the life of kiosks if they were kept outside all year long. On the other hand, DC is just too hot in the summer time to ride a bicycle. First world problems i guess…

  6. If you’re only putting in a limited number of stations, it’s better to put them in one part of the city. Spreading them out will only ensure that everyone has to go way out of their way, instead of just people living outside the coverage area. It also makes rebalancing more complicated, since people won’t have other stations nearby to potentially take/leave a bike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Why Aren’t American Bike-Share Systems Living Up to Their Potential?

As policy director at the New York City Department of Transportation from 2007 to June, 2014, Jon Orcutt shepherded the nation’s largest bike-share system through the earliest stages of planning, a wide-ranging public engagement process, and, last year, the rollout of hundreds of Citi Bike stations. That makes Orcutt, formerly of Transportation Alternatives and the Tri-State Transportation […]
Portland's program will make several types of adaptive bikes available for short-term rentals. Photo: Jonathan Maus/BikePortland via Better Bike-Share Partnership

Portland — And Soon, Detroit — Bring Bike-Share to People With Disabilities

Riding a bicycle is too often thought of as an activity that's off-limits for many disabled people. And that has continued to be the case with the bike-share systems getting off the ground in several American cities, which provide standard bicycles meant for the able-bodied. But that's starting to change, thanks to a yearlong effort in Portland that's the first of its kind in the United States.

Portland Back on Top in Bicycling Magazine’s City Rankings

Minneapolis versus Portland: This is shaping up to be quite a rivalry. Today, Pacific coast sustainability standard bearer Portland topped Midwestern standout Minneapolis in Bicycling Magazine’s bike-friendly city rankings, bi-annual source of bragging rights or shame, depending on your locale. The top-two results were a reversal of the 2010 rankings. Bicycling Magazine did not explain what […]

Portland’s Bike-Share System Will Be an Interesting One to Watch

Next week, leaders in Portland will decide whether to move forward with a long-awaited bike-share system. Assuming it proceeds, Portland’s bike-share is going to be an unusual one. Michael Andersen of BikePortland has everything you need to know in a series of posts on the proposed system (check them all out here). He reports that it would launch next summer with 600 bikes […]

A Big Week for Bicycling in Fort Worth

Let’s hear it for Fort Worth, Texas. This Texas city is leaving its big brother Dallas in the dust when it comes to bike-friendliness. Just this week, the feds awarded Fort Worth with $1 million for a 30-station bike-share system, which is slated to be up and running next April. And just yesterday, Fort Worth installed the Dallas […]

The Citi Bike Deal Is Great News for Other Cities Too

Andrew Tangel at the Wall Street Journal had an encouraging update this week on the Citi Bike buyout plan first reported by Dana Rubinstein in Capital New York. It looks like the city is days away from announcing a deal in which REQX Ventures, an affiliate of the Related Companies and its Equinox unit, will […]