Boston’s Over-the-Top “Bike Safety” Campaign

You’ve probably seen the anti-smoking ads that show a man exhaling through a hole in his windpipe. Not pretty, eh?

This image of a bloodied man is being used to promote helmet use among Boston cyclists. Photo: ##http://bostonbiker.org/2012/10/14/new-no-excuses-helmet-safety-campaign-misses-its-mark/##Boston Biker##

Well, the Boston Public Health Commission seems to have borrowed a page from that campaign in a new appeal to cyclists regarding helmet use. Check out the ad they’re using to promote protective headwear: a closeup of man with a serious case of road rash on his face.

Our friends at Boston Biker say this is the wrong approach:

This is some seriously violent imagery for a public safety campaign.

The idea being that you make not wearing a helmet socially unacceptable by appealing to the fear people have of getting injured. Anti-smoking campaigns work in a similar way, appealing to people’s fear of mortality in order to get them to make different choices. However there are some important differences.

  1. Smoking is an addiction, addictions require stronger pushes to get people to fight them.
  2. Cycling is GOOD FOR YOU! Showing bloody images of people on posters is not going to encourage people to cycle.
  3. More cyclists seem to equal safer cyclists. Several studies have shown that increasing the number of cyclists on the road will actually make them safer.
  4. Most fatal crashes involve vehicles and cyclists. Helmets are good, but driver/cyclist education, better engineered roads, and enforcement will go a lot further in preventing these crashes than helmet usage will.

So adding it all up, these bloody ad campaigns might actually do more harm than they avoid.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Steve Patterson at Urban Review STL says six months without a car has made him think differently about time, but it hasn’t made him less productive. Streets.mn praises a new initiative called “Investment Ready Places” that identifies small cities and towns in position to support mixed-use, walkable growth. And Greater Greater Washington explains why the safety benefits of automated traffic enforcement outweigh drivers’ irritation at having to follow the law.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Why Helmets Aren’t the Answer to Bike Safety — In One Chart

|
Better street design and getting more people on bikes — not blind faith in helmets — are the keys to making cycling safer, recent research has shown. Want a good visual to get the point across? The Toole Design Group made this for you. Of these countries, the U.S. has the highest rate of helmet usage among cyclists — around […]

More Evidence That Helmet Laws Don’t Work

|
If you want to increase cycling safety in your city, drop the helmet law and focus on getting more people– particularly women — on bikes, with street designs that offer separation from vehicle traffic. That’s the finding of a new study by researchers at the University of British Columbia [PDF] evaluating safety outcomes for cyclists across Canadian […]

London Is Going to Ban the Deadliest Trucks From Its Streets

|
Heavy trucks with big blind spots are a deadly menace to cyclists and pedestrians. In Boston, eight of the nine cyclist fatalities between 2012 and 2014 involved commercial vehicles, according to the Boston Cyclists Union [PDF]. Between June and September this year, there were six cyclist fatalities in Chicago, and all six involved commercial vehicles. In New York City, drivers […]