The Tea Party’s Selective Disdain for Transportation Subsidies
Does the Tea Party hate transportation subsidies or not? Sometimes it can be difficult to tell.
Here we have the Reason Foundation howling about a $1 million grant for Capital Bikeshare. And last week self-styled GOP budget hawks successfully wrested away federal funds from bike and pedestrian projects on the grounds that such programs are "wasteful."
But wait! Bloomberg reported that in the same week House Tea Party Republicans voted to maintain a $214 million program that subsidizes air travel to towns like Huron, South Dakota and Scottsbluff, Nebraska -- something that folks at the Cato Institute and fellow Republicans have argued is an unconscionable use of taxpayer money.
According to the Associated Press:
Tea party lawmakers from rural areas were among those fighting the hardest to preserve taxpayer subsidies for airline flights into and out of small towns last year after senior Republicans tried to eliminate the oft-criticized program. Now, the House Appropriations Committee is awarding the program an 11 percent budget hike. Next year, the subsidies would reach a record $214 million under a bill the GOP-run committee approved Tuesday.
The subsidies can reach hundreds of dollars per ticket — and can exceed $1,000 in a few routes. A recent change to the program will soon take care of such $1,000-plus cases, but critics of the program say more needs to be done to shelter taxpayers from runaway costs.
Network blog Systemic Failure says there couldn't be a better example of hypocrisy on transportation policy:
You’ve heard of the bridge-to-nowhere and the train-to-nowhere. There is also the “plane to nowhere.“ This is the same Congress which eliminated high-speed rail funding, and severely cut bike/ped programs. Unlike the “essential” air services program, high-speed trains and bike paths don’t require operating subsidies.
I, for one, will be holding my breath until the folks at Reason write a scathing denouncement of this program. Or could it be that they don't really hate subsidies as much as the idea of providing services used primarily by city-dwellers. Stay tuned.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Pedestrian Observations outlines "Plan B" for California High Speed Rail. Bike Delaware reports that the state's general assembly approved a watershed $13.25 million for bike and pedestrian spending. And A View from the Cycle Path looks at the decoupling of bike and car infrastructure.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Thursday’s Headlines Don’t Like Riding on the Passenger Side
Can you take me to the store, and then the bank? I've got five dollars you can put in the tank.
Study: When Speed Limits Rise on Interstates, So Do Crash Hot Spots on Nearby Roads
Rising interstate speeds don't just make roads deadlier for people who drive on them — and local decision makers need to be prepared.
‘We Don’t Need These Highways’: Author Megan Kimble on Texas’ Ongoing Freeway Fights
...and what they have to teach other communities across America.
Should Wednesday’s Headlines 86 SUVs?
American tax law encourages people to buy the gas-guzzling and deadly vehicles, but some in Canada are pushing to ban them.
Brightline West Breaks Ground on Vegas to SoCal High-Speed Rail
Brightline West will be a 218-mile 186-mile-per-hour rail line from Vegas to Rancho Cucamonga — about 40 miles east of downtown L.A. — expected to open in 2028.
