Seattleites Predict A-Park-alypse If Parking Minimums Are Lifted

Kudos to Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn for proposing a smart regulatory reform package that would, among other things, eliminate parking minimums on new developments near transit stops.

Can Seattle civilization continue if parking minimums are lifted on new developments near transit? Photo: ##http://seattle-daily-photo.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html## Seattle Photo Daily##

Of course, not everyone gets why it’s good for the city to stop forcing everyone to build parking. In a meeting held this week, many neighborhood residents predicted a car-storage doomsday scenario (people stuck in driveways, having to walk multiple blocks, you get the idea).

Erica C. Barnett of Network blog PubliCola was on hand for the meeting and jotted down these notes:

Reflecting the widespread (and, again, mistaken) belief that the legislation would eliminate existing parking spaces, most commenters opposed to lifting the parking requirement argued that the change would make it impossible for them to park in their neighborhoods.

For example, one property owner in Queen Anne said she already had to walk several blocks to get to her condo and that people in the neighborhood park on curbs, lawns, and any other illegal space they can find, and a self-identified landlord in West Seattle said she currently provides two spaces for every unit in her apartment building, and that without high parking minimums people would “park on the side streets and in residential areas and we can’t even get out of our driveway.”

On the flip side, Seattle Central Community College vice president Michael Pham said it was “cost-prohibitive” to require the school, located in the middle of one of Seattle’s densest neighborhoods to provide parking for students who mostly commute by transit. And Eric de Place of the Sightline Institute pointed out that both in per capita terms and in real numbers, people—particularly young people—are driving less. “When I filled up the tank last weekend in my car, gas was $4.30 a gallon, so it’s not surprising that if you’re a young person starting out or trying to make ends meet if you’re of modest means, car ownership is not necessarily a viable alternative” anymore, de Place said.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The Urbanophile shares a 1920s futurist vision for “solving” New York City’s congestion problems by burying vehicle traffic on multiple underground levels. Walk and Bike Berks County says Pennsylvania is about to get a 4-foot passing law. And New Jersey Future reports the state has unveiled a promising new vision focused on “redevelopment” of places already served by infrastructure.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Study: Parking Minimums Cost Seattle Renters $246 a Month

|
In Seattle, it’s now legal in certain neighborhoods to build apartment buildings with no parking. By saving on parking costs, owners can offer lower rents, and developers say there are waiting lists for parking-free buildings. But in most neighborhoods, Seattle still has laws that require a certain number of parking spaces per housing unit. According […]

Minneapolis May Drop Parking Minimums Near Transit

|
Whether you own a car or not, if you live in a city, there’s a good chance you pay for parking. Building parking spots is expensive, but most cities require developers to build a certain amount of parking per residence, driving up the cost of housing. Nick Magrino at Streets.mn reports that Minneapolis is rethinking that […]

More Affordable Housing, Fewer Driveways

|
As Minneapolis considers dropping parking minimums for residential developments near transit, Seattle may soon be talking about doing away with driveways for single-family houses. Erica C. Barnett at Seattle Transit Blog writes that Mayor Ed Murray’s committee on affordable housing and urban livability has drafted a proposal to replace single-family zoning with a new designation that would […]