Funding Mass Transit Security After Bin Laden

The demise of Osama Bin Laden has transit officials across the country preparing their agencies for possible retaliatory attacks. In Washington, Mayor Vincent Gray informed constituents via Twitter that “users will see an increase in # of officers throughout [Metro] system (trains & buses).” In New York, a spokesperson announced MTA had “increased security at key locations across the MTA’s transportation system and remain on high alert.” NJ Transit also beefed up security.

Security at this BART station depends on federal funding. Photo: ##

House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica (R-FL) and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano sounded the alarm about possible retaliation on mass transit systems within hours of the announcement of bin Laden’s death, though there were no credible threats and Napolitano did not issue an alert.

However, the push for increased transit security continues. This morning, transit professionals from across the country, testifying before the House Homeland Security Committee, used the opportunity to argue for increased federal transportation funding. They painted a grim picture of surface transportation security if funding is cut in the next reauthorization and seized the opportunity to ask members of congress to maintain funding for all facets of surface transportation security.

The Hearing opened with remarks from Chairman Peter King (R-NY), who warned that achieving “false economies” by reducing funds to transportation security could certainly bring a greater blow to the national economy if it “encouraged our enemies to launch a terrorist attack” of any size on our mass transit systems.

Without federal funding to support increased security, transit authorities like Chicago’s would have to cut service, said CTA President Richard Rodriguez. After a year of heavy cuts from state and local governments, CTA is concerned that if funding cuts to FEMA made in the FY2011 Budget were not resolved elsewhere, planned security measures would be postponed for several years. If additional cuts are made, people across 40 cities in Illinois could face reduced service.

While Rodriguez’s comments were bleak, no one was as direct as Daniel Hartwig, deputy chief of operations for the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Department (BARTPD), who said, “we could cease to exist” if federal funding were substantially cut for their program. BART carries 350,000 riders on a typical day. On an atypical day, like when the San Francisco Giants made it to the World Series, ridership numbers can jump 67 percent, making the city an immediate target for potential terrorist threat and requiring a significant security expense for his department.

Speaking on behalf of New York City’s Police Department, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism Richard Daddario also made it clear that New York City relies on federal money. Another terrorist attack would “choke” the city, he said. In a city where so many rely on transit to get to work, to shopping, to everywhere, anything that scared people off the bus or metro would bring a halt to the culture of urban life: “Moving about is not just about finances and economics, it’s about how we live.”

What does this mean for people who rely on mass transit? It is clear that TSA and FEMA support more security teams, cameras and other safety measures in all major transit centers, but these are not the only things your local transit agency might have to cut if federal funding falls short. Security is a priority and if your local station cannot be secured, your local bus route might just stop running.

7 thoughts on Funding Mass Transit Security After Bin Laden

  1. I sincerely hope that we can soon dispense with all of this useless “security theatre” in public places. It is a Bush-era relic of trying to inspire fear in the populace by suggesting threat of imminent attack. It does not prove out statistically. “Terrorism” is somewhere around #1537 on the likely causes of casualties list, somewhere between lightning strikes and being mauled by a mongoose.

    You’re something like 5000 times more likely to be adversely affected by being run down as a pedestrian or hurt by medical malpractice or killed in a car crash than any sort of involvement in so-called “terrorist” incident.

    Time for a reality check.

  2. Predictable bullshit. Let’s ramp up the fear factor — “The Terrorists! The Terrorists! The Terrorists Are Coming To Get Us!” Anything to allow our security overlords to grab more money — our money — and further abuse us. And the sheeple will fall right into line. What a pathetic nation we’ve become.

  3. “Security is a priority and if your local station cannot be secured, your local bus route might just stop running.”

    No more crack for you!

    Seriously: no TSA thugs committing 4th amendment violations on public property is hardly a tragedy. TSA thugs don’t provide security, they violate the personal security of every citizen they abuse.

    Keep the federal slime out of our urban transit centers. They are Constitution-shredding traitors, and have no business running wild in a free society.

  4. Are we still living in 2001? The way the politicians are talking in this article remind me of those times. There hasn’t been a major attack in a decade and probably won’t happen for a long time. Even if it does, it honestly has little physical impact on nation except psychological. What a bunch of fearmongering. I definitely don’t want more money for BART police so that they can shoot more unarmed black people.

  5. Deaths at Kings Cross Station in 1987 escalator fire: 31

    Deaths at Kings Cross Station due to bomb on 7/7/03 not including the suicide bomber: 26

    Deaths at Chatsworth, CA on 9/12/08 caused by texting locomotive engineer: 25

    Life has risk. Manage it cost-effectively.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Cutting Train Budgets Could De-Rail Transamerican Routes

The idyllic cross-country train trips that many Americans still take could get derailed by today’s “slash and burn” federal budget policies. Meanwhile, fears for the safety of rail passengers in the post-bin Laden era are drumming up political support for costly security measures and raising, once again, questions about why the federal government funds rail […]

What Libertarians Talk About When They Talk About Transportation Reform

There’s more than one way to approach transportation reform. One is to believe that an ideal transportation policy promotes the use of modes that are environmentally sustainable and which foster livable cities, while those that perpetuate overdependence on automobiles do neither. Then there is another camp, which approaches transportation from a micro, rather than macro, […]

Federal Transit Security Inspections: A Once-Every-Three Years Affair

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is linked most closely in the popular consciousness with aviation security, but its mandate also extends to protecting rail and transit systems — a job that needs to get more attention from the agency, according to senior senators from both parties. Security on New York City’s subway, above, was boosted […]

At Grand Central, Sen. Clinton Calls for Funding Mass Transit

Clinton was joined by (l-r) Larry Hanley, of the Amalgamated Transit Union, NYC DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney and MTA chief Elliot Sander Surrounded by a throng of curious commuters under the clock at Grand Central Terminal last Friday, Sen. Hillary Clinton held a press conference calling for increased federal funding for mass […]

Six Northeast Republicans Join Nadler, Oppose Boehner’s Attack on Transit

The House GOP bill, drafted with significant input from Speaker John Boehner’s office, would eliminate mass transit’s dedicated funding stream, first signed into law by Ronald Reagan in 1982. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a former House Republican, has called it “the worst transportation bill I’ve ever seen during 35 years of public service.” Some congressional […]