Senate Committee Backs Infrastructure Spending (But Not For Bike Lanes)

“We need to take care of this sooner than later,” Sen. Barbara Boxer said this morning in reference to a surface transportation reauthorization. “We can’t keep doing extension after extension.”

Photo from ##
Photo from ##

Before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee even has all its members named (that should happen in the next day or so, according to Sen. Boxer), it held a hearing to get the ball rolling on a new transportation bill.

“China is building railroads that will be going hundreds of miles an hour,” said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), “while America retreats more towards the rickshaw.”

Top committee Republican James Inhofe is all in favor of a big infrastructure bill, but his brand of support includes limiting the scope of the bill. “Our problem in getting the bill we need to get is really not as much the Democrats as it is the Republicans,” he acknowledged. “‘Cause I can hear it right now. They will get it to the floor and say, wait a minute, we’ve got museums in here and these other things.”

Later he clarified that “these other things” are “state capitol domes and bike trails,” which let loose a flurry of trash-talking about bike trails. “I wasn’t aware there were things in the infrastructure bill that aren’t real infrastructure,” said Raymond Poupore of the National Construction Alliance, who was testifying before the committee. “I always thought it was just highways.” And Bill Dorey of the Associated General Contractors of America added, “It’s hard for me to defend a bike path.”

Inhofe suggested that getting back to a meat-and-potatoes highway bill was the key to Republican support. “The best way I can get the full cooperation of the Republicans is if we took this back to the way it was originally, when we had the highway trust fund and the people who paid to use our highways would confine it to maintenance, new construction, bridges, highways then that would be sellable to the conservative community,” he said.

Some Democrats did rush to cyclists’ defense. Boxer herself let it be known that “to me, a bike path is a way of transport; a lot of my people use it to get to work.”

And Maryland Democrat Ben Cardin “took issue” with Inhofe’s dismissal of transportation enhancements. “We need to look at multimodal transportation. Yes, the overwhelming amount of dollars that are reauthorized are going to be for the  traditional types of transportation, whether they be roads or bridges or conventional transit. But we need to look at smarter ways,” he said. Baltimore’s designer, he said, tried to connect communities through greenspace.

We’re looking at ways of trying to connect communities again so they don’t have to use our roads! So we don’t have to build so many roads! To me, that saves money in our transportation! And it’s the right investement for our nation. Every dollar that we authorize needs to be spent efficiently and appropriately for transportation in this country. But let us not be afraid to look at alternative ways that can save money, create jobs, and then have more dollars available for the expensive projects that we know we need to build such as high speed rail.

Other Democrats, while not exactly taking up the bike trail issue, declared their love of asphalt. Montana Senator Max Baucus, who chairs the Finance Committee and sits on EPW, celebrated the fact that Montana has more highway miles per capita than any other state. “We love our highways,” he said.

Another theme that came up was the possibility of selling infrastructure investment as a jobs bill for veterans. Susan Martinovich of the Nevada DOT and AASHTO said the unemployment crisis in the construction sector hits home for her on a personal level. “My son is a sergeant in the US Marine Corps, recovering from serious wounds,” she told the committee. “He and many of his fellow Marines spent time in Afghanistan building infrastructure. Transportation is an industry that could provide jobs for these warriors. And they’re jobs that they’re skilled to undertake, but they’re not assured to be there.”

Sen. Boxer was intrigued by the idea. Poupore added that his organization has a Helmets to Hard Hats program that could be a model. Look for more talk of this in the future.

  • Larry Littlefield

    “China is building railroads that will be going hundreds of miles an hour,” said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), “while America retreats more towards the rickshaw.”

    At least we can afford the ricksaw.

    The place that really needs the bicycle is the suburbs and the Sunbelt. I can walk to shopping and the train if I don’t want to ride a bike. At lower densities, a bicycle is required for those trips.

  • Gonewest

    I understand that many people feel federal transportation money should be spent on infrastructure to move freight on the interstates, i.e direct benefit to the economy or at least that portion of the economy that depends on freight.

    But we’re going to keep on paying the price for unsustainable sprawl in our hosing and our communities.

  • Shemp

    So what’s with the headline? The committee took no action and Infhofe is not even the chair? Why is it always Streetblog’s angle to pump up the opponents of everything the blog claims to support?

    Get ready to defend good federal programs – call Senator Boxer, thank Senator Cardin are the stories here if you’d prefer to do something more than simply sit on your internet asses spouting pointless complaints and irony.

    WTF ??

  • Clutch J

    Our problem is that Boxer has expressed a desire to introduce a bill that has Inhofe’s support.

  • I don’t think it’s unreasonable to want the bill limited to transportation infrastructure and exclude “enhancements” that aren’t specifically some sort of pavement (or transfer station).

    At the same time, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to include bicycle paths and sidewalks in such a bill either. Biking and walking represent that “last mile” of sorts, ESPECIALLY walking, for all trips. Can’t exactly drive a car or take a train/bus right into your office/workplace door…at least not for the majority of us.

  • v

    well no surprise here, the NCA chairman opposes bike lanes, and inhofe justifies conservative support for throwing billions into a money-pit of new highways. to me, both show very little leadership. real conservative leadership would be explaining to the public why new highways are a money-pit, and how helping us climb out of our cars will save money on every trip americans take.

  • la rider

    Oh well, I guess if you’re Republican you hate bikes and love freeways. Makes me sad that even the Chinese are more forward thinking then we are. This is like watching MySpace go down while sticking to their guns, literally.

  • la rider

    Oh, by the way, China has full dedicated bike ways for those that still choose to ride the rickshaw for transportation.

  • Dan

    How about some outreach to senators from both parties — and the GCA — to let them know that bike and pedestrian projects create approximately twice as many jobs per dollar of spending as road construction projects?

  • Doug

    I watched the hearing, and was impressed with Dorey’s (construction industry guy) response to Imhofe. I’d say it was pro-bike, at least not anti-bike. Probably Imhofe thought he was throwing the construction industry a bone by mentioning non-traditional projects, but Dorey wasn’t biting. Dorey said something to the effect of “maybe sometimes the big highway project is a waste of money and there are smarter things to do”. That’s code for alternative modes over highways in some instances. That’s a pretty big deal coming from a construction industry guy. Dorey was walking a fine line, and he could’ve just played along with Imhofe, but he didn’t. I think that says something for where the construction industry is at least.

  • Concentrate on high value bike-ped projects that provide the most bang for the buck.


Sen. Boxer: Working With Mica, Inhofe on a Long-Term Transpo Bill

Senator Barbara Boxer told reporters today that she had an “excellent”, “wonderful” meeting with Rep. John Mica (R-FL), the new chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. She confirmed that they’re working on a “longer-term” transportation bill and have come up with many points of agreement. We’ll let you know more details about […]

Road and Transit Groups Join Boxer to Push for Senate Jobs Bill

Representatives from Washington’s road and transit lobbies joined Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today to call for swift passage of job-creation legislation that is slated for a vote in the upper chamber of Congress on Monday. Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) (Photo: AP) Faced with the prospects of a GOP filibuster, […]

Boxer and Inhofe Agree: Transportation Policy Reform Can Wait

Green transportation advocates are pressing Congress to refuse any new spending that’s not tied to reform of the existing system — a call that influential senators in both parties ruled out today. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) joined Sen. Jim Inhofe (OK), the panel’s ranking GOPer, in endorsing another 18 […]