State DOT Official, Rail Exec Talk High-Speed Rail Infighting, Bureaucracy

The push for dedicated U.S. high-speed rail funding began anew yesterday with the launch of a campaign aimed at securing $4 billion from Congress for next year’s projects — but hours before that event, federal and state transport officials joined private-sector players for a discussion that highlighted the political challenges facing successful development of fast inter-city rail networks.

7_15_08_high_speed_rail.jpgTaiwanese high-speed rail, above, opened for business in 2007 — less than a decade after final contracts were awarded. (Photo: Streetsblog LA)

The discussion, sponsored by the pro-rail group America 2050, focused largely on recommendations for the National Rail Plan that the U.S. DOT is expected to unveil this summer. Senators from both parties warned Obama administration aides last month that a more detailed vision for inter-city rail would be needed in order to win passage of significant new funding.

Frank Busalacchi, secretary of the Wisconsin state DOT — which is moving ahead with a Madison-Milwaukee link after winning an $810 million federal grant earlier this year — urged U.S. DOT officials to incorporate specific plans for a long-term revenue source into its rail plan.

Such fiscal certainty is essential for states that must line up equipment providers years in advance, he said: "You can’t start building a house until you have enough money to buy shingles for the roof."

But Busalacchi also acknowledged the rise of political infighting over high-speed rail, which recently came to a head in his state with conservative groups running ads against vulnerable Democratic lawmakers who support new train service.

"One of the problems we have as a country is that we all continue to fight with each other. … We spend a lot of our time defending this [$810 million] grant," he said, as critics charge that "it’s going to cost taxpayers money because you’re subsidizing the line."

Meanwhile, the Wisconsinite noted wryly, U.S. taxpayers have long subsidized road projects without any political backlash.

Busalacchi’s observations were echoed by Bruno Maestri, a senior lobbyist for the freight railroad Norfolk Southern. "Even at the U.S. DOT, we see fighting," Maestri said, adding that his company has "been shovel-ready for months" on one federally funded rail project that has languished due to conflicting statutes that govern highway spending (Title 23 of the U.S. code) and rail spending (Title 49).

If high-speed rail can clear political hurdles on the federal and local level, however, it has the potential to set the stage for future national objectives that govern all modes of transportation, according to Amtrak vice president for policy Stephen Gardner.

"Hopefully it’s a model-setting activity," Gardner told fellow panelists yesterday, citing the importance of local transit connections in planning for inter-city train service. "There are many who feel the time has come to look holistically across the entire sector, not just surface [transport] … and manage it like we know what we’re doing."

1 thought on State DOT Official, Rail Exec Talk High-Speed Rail Infighting, Bureaucracy

  1. On some aspects High Speed Rail’s progress has been discouraging. I see people who once thought this was a good idea give up and claim it has become what some would call a “boondoggle” but really if we want to move forward for better communities we need to make non car orientated travel modes like High Speed Rail move forward. I’m Not especially skilled yet in helping myself but I remain hopeful that we can obtain these goals, yes i’m the few but hopeful because it is a priority now on a lot of people’s minds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


LaHood Faces Off With GOP Senator Over High-Speed Rail, Livability

When Cabinet secretaries appear in front of Congress’ appropriations committees, which control the annual budgets for each federal agency, the proceedings tend to be dry affairs dominated by local concerns and arcane fiscal debates. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) (Photo: Politico) But Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s visit with Senate appropriators today was anything but humdrum, as […]

Coming Soon to Popular Transport Stimulus Programs: Local Funding

Two of the most popular transportation programs in the Obama administration’s stimulus law, the $1.5 billion in competitive grants known as TIGER and the $8 billion high-speed rail initiative, had an added feature that made them even more attractive to cities and states: the federal funding awards would not require a local match. Amtrak’s Empire […]

Tracing the Fault Lines Between Public and Private Transit Operators

Should private transit companies enjoy the same federal gas tax exemption that many public operators receive? How does the existence of private inter-city bus service affect the government’s development of new high-speed rail lines? And does it matter that private transit firms are eligible for public subsidies, even if at a much smaller rate than […]

Today’s Headlines

U.S. DOT’s new "TIGER II" grant program is encouraging Texas state DOT officials to hope the second time is a charm when it comes to funding a fix for an aging rail intersection … (Star-Telegram) … and Washington D.C. city officials to hope for new bike-share funding … (DC Biz Jrnl) … and northwestern Tennessee […]

Ohio, Wisc. Rail Money to be Transferred to 13 Other States

Ohio’s and Wisconsin’s loss will be 13 other states’ gain. U.S. Department of Transportation announced this afternoon that nearly $1.2 billion in passenger rail money will be withdrawn from the states of Ohio and Wisconsin at the behest of their incoming governors. The money will be transferred to other states to support “high speed rail […]