Report: Bush-Era Transit ‘Cost-Effectiveness’ Rule to Cost Charlotte $67M
When the Obama administration moved in January to undo a 2005 rule that made a federal "cost-effectiveness" rating the most important factor in determining which transit projects received funding, critics and even some transit advocates were skeptical, questioning whether the U.S. DOT would be able to legitimately quantify the community-building benefits of rail and bus networks.
The new light rail line in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Photo: UrbanRail.net)But federal officials continued to describe the shift as a significant boost for local transit planners, who will no longer need to design the budgets for new transit lines around the confines of a cost-effectiveness formula that attempted to measure the "incremental cost per hour" for each traveler.
Those who cheered the demise of the cost-effectiveness rule got new ammunition today from Greenwire, which sent a reporter to Charlotte, North Carolina, to track the city's plans for expanding its three-year-old light rail line.
The full story is available only to subscribers, but it puts a $67 million price tag on local transit planners' mandate to comply with the Bush-era cost-effectiveness standard. As Greenwire's Josh Voorhees explains:
Charlotte officials had originally wanted to build theline -- the first in a planned network spanning the metro area -- withthree-car trains. But the project was scaled back to a two-car systemto comply with a complicated cost-effectiveness formula then at theheart of the U.S. Transportation Department's criteria for federalfunding.
"In order to get the score we needed, they told uswe had to find a way to cut the project's scope," said John Muth, chiefdevelopment officer for the Charlotte Area Transit System. "We didn'treally have other options if we wanted the federal funding."
Now, as the city plans the second phase of its light-rail project, athree-car, 11-mile extension of the existing line from Uptown intonortheast Charlotte, it also must retrofit the existing track to carrythe longer trains. That means not only buying more rail cars, but alsolengthening platforms and boosting power distribution. Estimated pricetag of the retrofits: an additional $67 million.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Car Crashes by City Workers Cost NYC Taxpayers $180M in Payouts Last Year: Report
A record number of victims of crashes involving city employees in city-owned cars filed claims in fiscal year 2023 — and settlements with victims have jumped 23 percent, a new report shows.
Tuesday’s Headlines Are Driving Inflation
Driving — specifically, the cost of car ownership — is one of the main factors behind inflation, according to the Eno Center for Transportation.
SEE IT: How Much (Or How Little) Driving is Going on in America’s Top Metros
Check it out: The lowest-mileage region isn't the one you'd think.
Monday’s Headlines Bring Another Setback
The Biden administration's new rule requiring states to report their greenhouse gas emissions from transportation was dealt another blow when the Senate voted to repeal it.
‘The Bike Is the Cure’: Meet New Congressional Bike Caucus Chair Mike Thompson
Meet the incoming co-chair of the congressional bike caucus — and learn more about how he's getting other legislators riding.
