White House and Congress Take Issue With AP’s Transport Stimulus Claims

The Associated Press published a piece today that, after putting "economists and statisticians" to work on analyzing $21 billion in federal stimulus money for transportation, reached a volatile conclusion:

cityroom_20090914_ahill_85420_Mino_large.png(Photo: WBEZ)

Local unemployment rates rose and fell regardless of how much stimulus
money Washington poured out for transportation, raising questions about
Obama’s argument that more road money would address an "urgent need to
accelerate job growth."

The very idea of measuring the immediate effects of transportation stimulus spending on joblessness is highly dubious, for two reasons underscored by the U.S. DOT’s quickly blogged pushback to the AP story.

Firstly, for all the White House’s talk of "shovel-readiness," the need to put transport projects out to bid, sign contracts, and hire workers means that stimulus dollars take some time to affect broader local economies. The latest congressional data shows that work has started on 57 percent, or $19.7 billion, of the stimulus law’s $34.3 billion in road and transit funding.

That ripple effect for transport spending ironically could end up helping states, such as Florida, that were slow out of the gate in allocating stimulus money but continue to struggle with high unemployment.

Secondly (despite the best efforts of some senior Democrats) transportation only accounted for 6 percent of the stimulus’ $787 billion in total spending. Why expect such a small slice of the legislation to have a major impact on unemployment rates? House transport committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) and his top lieutenant, Rep. Pete DeFazio (D-OR), today compared the AP’s assumptions to "saying it is a waste of time to feed a
homeless family because that one act does not cure poverty."

Also from Oberstar and DeFazio’s rebuttal to the AP:

Furthermore,
these statistics do not include indirect and induced jobs in the supply chain,
such as positions that produce construction materials or manufacture
equipment.  The impact of these jobs is not limited to a single state or
local community.  For example, the Virginia Railway Express in Northern
Virginia used Recovery Act funds to purchase 15 locomotives manufactured in
Boise, Idaho.  VRE will begin receiving the new locomotives later this
summer.  While this local decision creates jobs in Virginia, the impact is
also felt in Idaho and throughout the country’s vast supply chain.  When
you include these indirect and induced jobs, the Committee calculates that
total employment from transportation investments under the Recovery Act reaches
over 760,000

Perhaps the most curious of the AP reporters’ rhetorical flourishes was this sentence:

Even within the construction industry, which stood to benefit most from
transportation money, the AP’s analysis found there was nearly no
connection between stimulus money and the number of construction
workers hired or fired since Congress passed the recovery program.

It’s true that the transportation represents a small sector of the broader construction industry. But that industry is dominated by home building, which is still coming down from an unprecedented bubble-bursting.

And expecting the industry as a whole to benefit from transport-specific spending that was funneled through state DOTs is rather like expecting the industry to benefit from more spending on military aircraft; after all, Boeing works on construction as well …

Even transport reform advocates who found the stimulus bill something of a letdown emerged today to scratch their heads at the AP’s work. Laura Barrett, executive director of the Transportation Equity Network, said in a statement:

In a perfect world, we could spend years constructing a perfectly efficient
economic stimulus program. In the real world, people need jobs today. Most
transportation jobs pay good wages and help build careers that lift families
out of poverty. We need more transportation spending in the new jobs bill
before Congress, not less — especially in the public transportation sector, which
creates nearly twice as many jobs per dollar as road construction does, and helps protect our
environment at the same time.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

NY and CA: How Did They Spend Transportation Stimulus Money?

|
In an economic recovery report released today by New York Gov. David Paterson (D), the state broke down its plans for the estimated $31 billion it received as part of the Obama administration’s first stimulus law. New York spent more than half of its transport stimulus money on transit. (Photo: PlanetWare) A chart of New […]

Stimulus Bill Is a Step Forward for Pedestrians, Cyclists & Cities

|
Within the $27.5 billion allocated for "highways" in the stimulus bill signed by President Obama yesterday, there is some good news for pedestrians, cyclists and cities. I spoke with Michelle Ernst, staff analyst at the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, to get a sense of how the new legislation compares to the 2005 federal transportation bill, known […]

Spending Transportation Stimulus Money Fast vs. Spending it Well

|
How fast is the economic stimulus law’s $48 billion in transportation aid being spent — and is it being spent on the right projects? The relative importance of those two questions made for lively debate in the House transportation committee yesterday. Though $29.4 billion of the transportation stimulus pot has been promised to specific projects, […]

Less Than One Percent of Transpo Stimulus Money Paid Out So Far

|
The New York Times reports this morning that the Obama administration’s $787 billion economic stimulus package has hit a few snags: Some states and cities are beginning to complain that the money has yet to reach them. Others have been slow to get their paperwork to Washington; Virginia has yet to send the Transportation Department […]