16 Cities That Are Leading the Way in the Climate Change Fight

Long before Congress started to take the threat of climate change seriously, American mayors were already recognizing the need to decrease fossil-fuel consumption, promote efficiency, and generally create more livable places.

rkv30qh.jpgScott Smith of Mesa, AZ, the 1000th U.S. mayor to endorse emissions-reduction targets. (Photo: East Valley Trib)

Scott Smith, the mayor of Mesa, Arizona, recently became the 1,000th city chief to sign on to the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement [PDF], first ratified in 2005 as a way for localities to commit to meet the Kyoto emissions reduction targets that the Bush administration declined to endorse.

Smith’s move prompted a report in this weekend’s New York Times, which hailed city-level sustainability efforts such as those showcased on Capitol Hill back in July. While the nation has long been more urban than rural — in fact, an estimated two-thirds of Americans now live in the nation’s 100 biggest cities — the Times cast some doubt on prior portrayals of cities as proportionally significant energy consumers:

“Cities occupy two percent of the world’s land mass yet
contribute more than two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions,”
begins the Clinton Initiative’s online explication of its C-40 program,
which unites large cities across the globe in a commitment to reducing
greenhouse gases. …

But other researchers — including David Satterthwaite, a senior fellow
at the International Institute for Environment and Development in
London — have challenged those numbers, claiming that they are at best
exaggerated and in reality unknowable.

Writing in the March
2009 issue of the United Nations Human Settlements Program’s flagship
magazine, Urban World, Mr. Satterthwaite and his colleague David
Dodman, drawing on the most recent figures of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, estimate that cities contribute somewhere
between 30 and 41 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

What was mentioned but not discussed by the Times is the Conference of Mayors’ report [PDF] on 16 cities that have adopted innovative strategies to cut pollution. The entire report is worth a read (though New Yorkers, San Franciscans and Portland-ites may be disappointed to find their hometowns not listed), not least because most mayors single out land use and transportation planning as central elements of their policy-making on environment and energy.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Nobody wants this.

Mayors Seek Transit Funds To Fight Climate Change

|
A coalition of mayors wants Congress to declare a "Marshall Plan" against climate change by spending on mass transit to curb air pollution in their cities. The mayors of Atlanta, Honolulu, St. Paul, Pittsburgh, and Portland, Ore., implored senators at a climate hearing on Capitol Hill last week to invest in renewable-energy programs in order to create jobs and fund bus and rail systems, with the goal of weening people off gas-polluting vehicles.

How Much Can Bicycling Help Fight Climate Change? A Lot, If Cities Try

|
A new study from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy attempts to measure the potential of bikes and e-bikes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ITDP’s conclusion, in short: Bicycling could help cut carbon emissions from urban transportation 11 percent. The authors calculated the carbon emissions reduction that could result if cities around the world make a strong, sustained […]

Transit Union and Sierra Club Join Forces for Earth Day and Beyond

|
Earth Day is a week from tomorrow. How many people will drive to their local environmental festival without even a second thought to how they got there? The Amalgamated Transit Union and the Sierra Club will announce tomorrow that they are joining forces to highlight the connection between transportation and climate change. Transit is important, […]