Which Mitt Would Shape U.S. Transpo Policy: The Governor or the Candidate?

Tomorrow, Americans will decide who will be President of the United States for the next four years. On Friday, we took a look at the last four years of White House transportation policy under President Barack Obama. Today we review the record and the platform of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. Streetsblog does not endorse candidates.
Mitt Romney's well-reasoned views on energy and development morphed into a lovefest for fossil fuels as he set his sights on the White House. Photo courtesy of ##http://www.mittromney.com/gallery##Romney for President##

If Mitt Romney the President reverts back to the positions of Mitt Romney the Governor, transportation policy in America could see significant steps forward. Better-maintained roads. Smarter growth. Cleaner air.

But if Mitt Romney the President follows through on the rhetoric of Mitt Romney the Campaigner, it will be a different story.

Not that candidate Romney has talked much about transportation. But he’s made it clear he’s casting his lot with the fossil fuel industry. He’s brought billionaire oil man Harold Hamm into his inner circle as an energy advisor, pushing for more drilling. Romney has raised $11.4 million directly from the energy sector, and far more than that has been poured into anti-Obama, pro-drilling TV ads by oil companies.

What did the oil industry get for their generosity? For starters, Romney’s energy plan reads like a parody of desperate political pandering to Texas oil barons. Maximum drilling is paramount. Reducing oil consumption is a quaint little notion for liberals and sweater-wearers. To candidate Romney, the idea of reversing climate change and slowing the rise of the oceans is a laugh line – a joke that suddenly doesn’t seem so funny to people living by the New Jersey and New York coastline.

Romney is now the standard-bearer for a Republican Party whose platform accuses President Obama of engaging in “social engineering” in pursuit of “an exclusively urban vision of dense housing and government transit.” The GOP platform indulges in Agenda 21 paranoia and doesn’t talk much about renewable energy or fuel efficiency. It brags about the worst parts of the recently-passed transportation bill, revives old calls for the privatization of Amtrak services, and cheers on highway-builders.

Romney himself has advocated for ending subsidies to Amtrak and eliminating the Department of Housing and Urban Development. And by nominating extreme budget-cutter Representative Paul Ryan to be his running mate, Romney aligned himself with a plan to cut transportation spending to Highway Trust Fund levels, slashing about a third of the current budget.

At one of the presidential debates, Romney perpetuated the latest conservative myth about gas prices, saying, “If the president’s energy policies are working, you’re going to see the cost of energy come down.” (That debate exchange wasn’t Obama’s best moment either; when Candy Crowley pressed him, he refused to directly refute the notion that it’s “within the purview of the government to bring [gas] prices down.”)

It’s a shame to hear Romney talk like this, because as governor of blue-state Massachusetts, he had a far more nuanced and forward-looking analysis of gas prices. Alec MacGillis, writing in The New Republic this spring with an excellent analysis of Romney’s years as governor, said that Romney refused to cave to pressure for a gas tax holiday when prices were high in 2006. “I don’t think that now is the time, and I’m not sure there will be the right time, for us to encourage the use of more gasoline,” Romney said then. “I’m very much in favor of people recognizing that these high gasoline prices are probably here to stay.” That’s a refreshing dose of realism.

Romney enacted real policy innovations while in office, too. He brought conservationist and bike commuter Doug Foy on to run the Office for Commonwealth Development, embarking on a path of smart growth. All this “really woolly, totally green, new-urbanist stuff” was official state policy under Governor Romney, Boston Globe-writer-turned-Foy-employee Anthony Flint told MacGillis.

Together, Romney and Foy prioritized transportation maintenance over new infrastructure, tamed high-speed local streets, increased housing density, cut sprawl, and advocated for progressive zoning. Romney tried to move Massachusetts past the era of the Big Dig highway boondoggle and said all the right things about avoiding the construction of excessively wide roads.

While he didn’t keep all his promises about building transit, some have speculated that, in keeping with his fix-it-first ethos, Romney was right to focus more on transit repair than new capacity.

He cared about fuel efficiency, scorning the “gas guzzling dinosaurs” his automaker father taught him to hate. But then he stopped following through. At the last minute, he got cold feet about a regional cap-and-trade tax plan and killed the proposal his staff had spent two years negotiating. The New York Times wrote a story this fall about that decision and other environmental flip-flops the governor made when he started eyeing the presidency.

It’s fascinating to speculate about how Romney might shape American transportation policy if he applied some of his early advances in Massachusetts to the nation’s problems. But it’s been a long time since Governor Romney has been spotted on the campaign trail.

  • Anonymous

    I think the answer is clear: follow the money.  Romney’s in the debt of those who fund his campaign.  Romney the governor is irrelevant.  That said, I’d gladly take slashed federal transportation spending, as long as road budgets were slashed along with mass-transit.  The federal government has proven itself incompetent year after year, decade after decade at transportation policy.  We’re much better off dealing directly with the states.

  • MikeM

    Follow the money indeed, Obama gave huge bucks to alt energy after being elected using some of their funds, I expect Romney to re-pay the favor to the oil industry, and I doubt the new york subway operators union (could be made up) gave any money to Romney/Ryan 2012.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

What Went Unsaid at Last Night’s Debate

|
At last night’s presidential debate in Nassau County, the best opening for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney to talk about transportation policy came when undecided voter Phillip Tricolla asked the following question of the President: QUESTION: Your energy secretary, Steven Chu, has now been on record three times stating it’s not policy of his department […]

Would President Romney Build Roads or Rail?

|
All eyes are on Texas Gov. Rick Perry these days, the faraway frontrunner in the Republican race. But as the primary goes on (and on and on) more Republicans might take note of the fact that in a matchup with President Obama, only one candidate stands a chance of winning: former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. […]

The Big Deception in Mitt Romney’s Global Warming Brush-Off

|
Well, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney declined to get into details about his plans for the nation’s transportation system during his big speech in Tampa last night. Romney has been tight-lipped about actual policy recommendations throughout his campaign, although a platform released by the GOP this week was basically a worst case scenario for sustainable transportation and […]

Billionaire Oil Driller Serving as Romney Energy Advisor

|
When it comes to transportation and energy policy, it’s tough to tell exactly where Mitt Romney stands, but there’s a lot to be learned by watching whom he’s keeping close. Yesterday we covered how his VP choice, Paul Ryan, looks to be a policy disaster for sustainable transportation. Ryan indicated in his attention-grabbing but largely […]