This Could Be the Biggest Year Ever for Transit at the Ballot Box

Next month, 19 transit-related measures will come before voters. If the rest of this year is any guide, 16 of them will pass.

The "Transportation Penny" in Richland County, South Carolina will fund some pedestrian improvements, along with roads and transit, if voters approve it November 6. Image: ##http://www.richlandonline.com/TransportationPenny/index.asp##Richland County##

Despite a high-profile loss in Atlanta a few months ago, transit referenda have an 86 percent success rate so far this year, according to the Center For Transportation Excellence.

It strikes some as counterintuitive: During an economic downturn, in a virulently anti-tax climate, why are voters deciding time and time again to tax themselves to support transit?

CFTE Director Jason Jordan says the lousy economy is one reason so many of these measures keep popping up — more this year than any other since CTFE started counting in 2000. With states crying poverty and the federal government, for the first time ever, passing a transportation bill that was no bigger than the one that preceded it, local governments have had to take matters into their own hands.

Jordan says the most unique of all of next month’s ballot initiatives is a gas tax measure in Memphis. Almost all the initiatives we see are sales taxes or property taxes, with a handful of bond measures and vehicle fees. Most cities don’t have the authority to raise gas taxes independent of the state — but Memphis does, and it’s trying to increase the tax by one cent to raise $3 million to $6 million for the transit authority. “Here we have an example of communities being pushed to be as creative as possible,” Jordan said.

No other local gas tax measure is on the ballot. Indianapolis has a citywide income tax hike in the works, which will also be novel, but they didn’t make it happen for this year.

Another one to watch is the half-cent sales tax in Orange County, North Carolina, which includes the city of Chapel Hill. If it succeeds, the three counties of the so-called Research Triangle will likely join together to improve their regional transit system. If it fails, the whole thing falls apart.

Durham County, North Carolina, approved its tax increase last year, just after the state legislature lifted a ban on local sales tax authority. Durham County is spending some of its new sales tax on local bus service and is holding some in escrow to build light rail with Orange County and Raleigh’s Wake County — if they both approve it. Wake County was planning a vote for 2012 but decided to wait.

If the measure succeeds in Orange County, the pressure will be high for Wake County to follow suit. “This is a region that’s going to rise or fall together, in terms of regional transit improvement,” Jordan said. The city of Raleigh approved a bond measure last year and was awarded a $21 million TIGER grant for an inter-city passenger rail station.

The biggest bounty could go to Los Angeles, which will vote to extend 2008’s Measure R — a 30-year half-cent sales tax increase — for another 30 years to pay for a variety of roadway and transit improvements. The massive expansion of the federal TIFIA loan program has increased the pressure for the city to extend its revenue stream to pay for its transit expansion plan. Measure J, as it’s called, will require a two-thirds super-majority in order to pass. California cities depend on sales taxes because the state banned local property tax hikes in the 1970s.

Another contest to watch, Jordan says, is a one-cent sales tax increase in Richland County, South Carolina, where Columbia sits. About 60 percent of the tax hike, which they’re calling “the transportation penny,” would go to roads. About 30 percent would go to bus service, with about 8 percent devoted to bike and pedestrian improvements. More than anything, Jordan said, this vote would serve to validate a trend showing greater support — and willingness to pay — for transit in southern states.

That measure might have an uphill climb, though. Multi-modal initiatives like the one in Columbia used to be more common, but the prevailing wisdom these days is that voters prefer to support one project that they can wrap their heads around, as opposed to a smorgasboard with a little something for everyone. That criticism was lodged against Atlanta’s massive project list in the failed T-SPLOST vote and Seattle’s unsuccessful car tab measure last year.

Jordan warns that municipalities shouldn’t put too much faith in revenues from sales taxes, however. He said that created problems in Denver, when the recession drove sales down and the city ended up with less revenue than expected for its transit expansion — meaning FasTracks will be slow-tracked.

Kansas City, Missouri is trying its luck with a one-cent sales tax to be collected within the downtown streetcar district. They’re holding a special mail-in election on the matter, with ballots due December 11. That’s its first hurdle. The second is the fact that, according to Jordan, Kansas City gets the authority from Missouri to go to voters with initiatives like this, but never from Kansas. That makes it challenging to plan improvements for the whole city.

These are just a few of the transit-related contests on the ballot November 6. Jordan says his group doesn’t track roadway ballot measures as closely, but we’ll bring you more on those and other election news over the next four weeks.

  • Kansas City’s streetcar plan is also funded by special assessments on commercial, residential, and municipal property adjacent to the route — as well as a per-space assessment on public pay parking lots (perhaps a first in the country for transit?).

  • Scott Adams

    Re: Per-space assessment on public pay parking lots in KC, Baltimore levies a 20% parking tax (est. $5 million/year), which helps fund its free Charm City Circulator network of local buses serving downtown and close-in neighborhoods. Philadelphia has a 20% parking tax (not sure if it funds transit) and Pittsburgh has a 40% parking tax (again, not sure if it funds transit).

    As for Richland County, SC, they could probably use some transportation funds, as they’re certainly not going to get them from SCDOT – SC has one of the lowest gas tax rates in the US, 16 cents/gallon, which like many other states, is NOT indexed to inflation and hasn’t been adjusted since in 1987.  We’ve got some mixed-up priorities if we’re willing to pay 2012-prices for sneakers made to look like they’re from 1987 (Neon yellow? Rad!), yet delude ourselves into thinking we can pay 1987-prices for 2012-era transportation systems.

  • Tony

    No to J.  Not sure why most of LA County would want to pay for a small percentages transportation.  Let those who can use it pay for it; the rest of us have to buy gas.

  • Yes on J. If LA is to grow, the only way is public transit. Have you seen the freeways around here?

  • David Crossley

    Houston has one, too, and it’s by far the strangest. The transit agency’s board is asking voters to deprive it of a fourth of its sales tax revenue in order to halt rail expansion and build more roads. Obviously, the correct response is to vote no.

  • Greg Cohen

    Upon closer inspection, the CFTE statistics on their website are very suspect.  28 of the 33 so-called wins were simply Michigan county ballots to retain existing tax levies — not an increase.  Of the other five, two Louisiana ballots were to keep existing taxes, two West Virginia ballots were to keep existing taxes and the one Everett, Washington ballot measure is unclear from the description on CFTE’s website.  I

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Communities Vote to Tax Themselves to Support Transit

|
In addition to some of the high-profile measures that we covered already, Election Day brought many successes on some smaller ballot initiatives. According to the Center For Transportation Excellence, pro-transit campaigns had an 80 percent success rate this year at the ballot box, with more ballot measures coming up for a vote than any previous […]

UPDATED: Last Night’s Quiet Transit Victories

|
Yesterday was a relatively quiet election day for transportation-related ballot measures, but of the six transit initiatives that came before voters yesterday, five six passed, with a sixth seventh too close to call. That’s in line with last year’s 79 percent success rate — 71 percent since 2000. When asked, voters overwhelmingly choose to raise […]

Where to Get Your 2012 Transportation Ballot Results

|
It’s Election Day — finally! The top of the ticket has sucked most of the oxygen out of the room, but don’t forget that there are 19 transportation-related measures on ballots across the country. So far this year, pro-transit measures have an 86 percent success rate at the ballot, and there are more transportation amendments being […]

6 Transportation Ballot Initiatives to Watch Next Tuesday

|
Next week, voters in Maryland and Wisconsin may tell state officials to keep their greedy paws off transportation funds. Louisianans will consider whether to create an infrastructure bank to help finance projects. Texans will weigh the wisdom of raiding the state’s Rainy Day Fund for — what else? — highways. And Massachusetts activists who have […]

The Silver Lining: 73 Percent of Transpo Ballot Measures Win

|
Ready for some good news? Voters around the country got to decide on 29 transportation-related ballot initiatives yesterday. According to an analysis by the Center for Transportation Excellence, transportation advocates and reformers won 73 percent of them. If you add in other initiatives that passed earlier this year, the victory rate jumps to 77 percent. […]

More Election Results: Transit Wins Big

|
Out of 12 transportation-related measures that were voted on Tuesday, seven represented a victory for transit, three were losses to learn from, and two more aren’t really a win one way or another but are worth noting. According to the Center for Transportation Excellence, these numbers bring the year’s total to an impressive 79 percent win […]