House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud

John Mica, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, officially unveiled his committee’s transportation bill, the “American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act,” at a press conference outside the House wing of the Capitol this afternoon. (All 846 pages of bill text are here: [PDF])

There's something for everyone to dislike in John Boehner and John Mica's transportation bill. Photo: ##http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120117-occupy-dc-1045a.photoblog600.jpg##Zimbio##

Streetsblog wrote about some of the bill’s low points last week: no more dedicated bike/ped funding; no more TIGER or other discretionary transit programs; more money for highways, less accountability for state DOTs. To top it off, Speaker John Boehner has made it a priority to attach the Keystone XL pipeline to the transportation bill somehow.

The truth is that there are a lot of things that a lot of sensible people find objectionable about this bill, and they’re having their say while they can — the bill will be marked up on Thursday.

Regarding the changes to bike/ped policy, Darren Flusche, policy analyst at the League of American Bicyclists, told Streetsblog:

You can bet that the performance measures that states would be required to meet will not be geared towards the myriad transportation benefits of bicycling and walking projects, making the “eligibility” for bicycling and walking projects an illusion.  In this way, the bill would actually take away flexibility from the states instead of provide it, as claimed.

Provisions that would raise weight and length limits on trucks drew ire from the Association of American Railroads:

“Americans don’t want 97,000 pound trucks or huge multi-trailers up to 120 feet long on our nation’s highways,” said AAR President and CEO Ed Hamberger. “Nor is it fair that even more of the public’s tax dollars will be used to pay for the road and bridge damage inflicted by massive trucks.”

John Cross, federal transportation advocate with Environment America, had this to say about the bill’s environmental implications:

The bill introduced by Representative Mica today in the House of Representatives drives us down to the dead end of too many oil spills, too much air pollution, and destroying the places we love. It reads like a wish list for Big Oil.

The Natural Resources Defense Council’s Rob Perks called out the Speaker of the House for unnecessarily complicating matters:

I’ve heard of “my way or the highway” but this is ridiculous. In an unprecedented move, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is hell-bent on crashing the transportation bill by loading it up with controversial issues that will guarantee more political gridlock.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) objected to the partisan politics behind its drafting:

I am disturbed by the un-democratic and non-transparent fashion with which the majority has drafted and introduced its bill. Democrats have been left entirely out of the process and, now, after more than a year of waiting for this legislation, we have 48 hours to assimilate 800 pages before it is marked up.

As Rep. Nadler pointed out, the bill is quite long. Streetsblog will report more details from the bill as we learn them. We will also address efforts underway to amend the bill into a less objectionable state. Even Chairman Mica indicated that there could be some serious tinkering done to this bill, telling reporters to “get some hemorrhoid cream ointment and hang on” during long negotiations.

  • Dlovaas

    Here is my new question: The revenue from drilling will take years and most likely fall far short of what’s needed. So presumably tens-of-billions of dollars will have to be borrowed, contributing to the nation’s deficit. And it’s being touted as a “jobs bill.” So I would like House Republicans to explain to fiscal conservatives (a camp I find myself in, increasingly): How is this not the same thing as the President’s stimulus bill (with a highway focus and lots of awful policy)?

  • Tanya Snyder

    So frustrating! The Senate actually did the dirty work of hammering out difficult compromises in order to get a consensus bill that could bring together the likes of Barbara Boxer and James Inhofe. But the House is still playing these partisan games, even with only two months left before the extension expires. There goes the last shred of hope of passing a long-term bill by March 31.

    And, thanks Ben, for bringing us the news! It’s such a treat to get to just READ Streetsblog for a change! 🙂

  • D Levinger

    I will be interested to see a list of the organizations endorsing this bill as introduced. I see that AEM (Assn of Equipment Mfrs) is supporting it. Who else? This may help gage the challenge of opposing it.

  • The bill refers to “bicycling” or “pedestrian” 14 and 15 times, respectively.  It would have been nice if they used those words for more than just a way to get to 800 pages.

    This is a waste of paper. Why can’t congress simply say, “states: we will give you less money but lift the restrictions on it’s use. If you need to build transit, do that; if you can create better biking and walking infrastructure, go ahead; If you need to replace roads and bridges that are deteriorating, do what needs to be done”?

    Congress, please simplify this mess so that states and localities have more freedom to make the best decisions for their residents.

  • Brandi

    This is what is wrong with Washington.  The democrats always hammer out a compromise which the Republicans participate in crafting and then reject.  They then move further right and pretend the compromise is the Dem’s position.  This continues to drive the dialogue further and further right.   This transportation bill is so backward it might as well have had a provision promoting the use of horse and buggy via a gold panning tax.  Seems like the whole transportation dialogue has gone to hell in the last 4 years.  Sad.   Shame Obama is the only adult in the room. 

  • Brandi

    Also giving more money to state DOT’s is not the answer. They ignore the job-creating urban areas of the coutnry and spend it in the rural areas of their state.  Look at New York constantly cutting funding to the MTA and building a huge Tappan Zee without transit.  Our look at Christie, funneling money for ARC to highways. 

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

No Details Yet on House Transportation and Oil Drilling Bill

|
House leaders did not unveil a bill at their press conference this morning. House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica said the bill, when it is released, will: consolidate duplicative parts of the federal transportation system shift responsibility to states and local governments to move transportation projects forward increase the ability to leverage financial resources significantly […]

John Mica Sidelined by House Leadership for Transpo Bill Rewrite

|
CQ and AmericaBikes are reporting that Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John Mica (R-FL) has received a rebuke from House leadership, and will play a lesser role as the House reworks its foundering transportation bill. Mica will retain his chairmanship, but he will take a back seat to Railroad Subcommittee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA). According […]

Boehner Masks GOP Attack on Safe Streets By Opposing Flowers

|
House Speaker John Boehner spoke to reporters yesterday morning. His message: “Republicans Relentlessly Focused on Jobs.” “House Republicans want to get a highway bill done,” he said. “We want a bill, and our colleagues are working toward producing a bill. We just want to make sure it’s a bill that includes real reforms, to ensure […]

Mica Drops Chairmanship Bid, Endorses Shuster

|
Rep. John Mica (R-FL) has withdrawn from the running to remain chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He was up against Republican term limits, which specify that no Congressmember can spend more than six years as the highest-ranking member of their party on a committee — regardless of whether that time is spent […]