The Design Tragedies That Pass for Road “Improvements”

Let’s say a cash-strapped city invests a quarter of a million dollars to speed traffic on a road. But those precious local resources would only serve to make the road more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists — and might even lengthen wait times for people in cars.

Officials in Fresno want to spend $250,000 on a new turn bay at this intersection, marked off in red. Photo: ##http://stopandmove.blogspot.com/2012/01/250000-to-add-right-turn-lane.html##Stop and Move##

You might call it crazy. But in old-school transportation engineering circles, they call things like that “improvements” or “upgrades.”

According to James Sinclair at Network blog Stop and Move, that’s exactly what’s happening in the city of Fresno, where local officials have decided to spend $250,000 on a new turn lane at an intersection that’s already a disaster for pedestrians:

Since this is Fresno, we know there’s nothing higher on the priority list than finding yet another way to widen a street. An upgrade, as it’s usually called, although the only thing being upgraded are vehicle speeds. And even that is questionable. Yes, one would expect a dedicated turn lane to improve the efficiency of those looking to turn right in their private vehicle … But what of everyone else?

In my calculations, this “improvement” negatively impacts many people. Pedestrians lose out in two big ways. Well, three, if you include the fact that $250,000 could have probably built a whole lot of sidewalk in places without any…

1) Those crossing Kings Canyon find themselves with an even wider road to cross, and so an even less pleasant experience. Pedestrians crossing Kings Canyon must already walk past 7 lanes, and now it will be 8 (one of the lanes is an unstriped bus bay). That’s 96 feet, just to make it across a road.

2) And now they’ll have to deal with a lovely right turn lane, in which turning right on red as quickly as possible is almost the law. Those crossing north will have to be on their toes if there is a large vehicle in the right-through lane, because anyone wishing to turn right in the new lane will speed past the crosswalk line to get a good view.

Sinclair goes on to add that the expensive new lane will also, ironically, slow down car travel, because the additional width will require longer crossing times for pedestrians. I think this is what you might call a lose-lose.

Elsewhere on the network today: Pattern Cities asks readers to participate in a research project to identify conflicts between public and private space. Seattle Transit Blog explores how bike sharing systems can be made available to those who lack bank accounts. And Carfree with Kids shows off their expanded-cargospace bike collection, perfect for ferrying around to youngsters.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

How You Can Tell Your City Doesn’t Care About Pedestrians

|
If you live in a town that doesn’t consider pedestrian safety a very high priority, the signs are probably pretty obvious if you spend any time walking. James Sinclair feels like he’s being beat over the head with signs — sometimes actual, literal signs — in the Fresno suburb of Clovis, California. He writes on Stop […]

A University Built Around the Car Sees the Light

|
Fresno State University was, until very recently, your prototypical car commuting school. The school began as an isolated agricultural institution and is still connected to a large university farm. Its transportation services haven’t extended much beyond subsidized parking. But over time, writes James Sinclair at Streetsblog Network member Stop and Move, the area around Fresno State became more […]

Planning Director Claims 6,600-Home Development on Farmland Isn’t Sprawl

|
Building 6,600 homes on farmland outside city boundaries? Some might consider that the very definition of sprawl. But leaders in the Fresno region beg to differ. James Sinclair at Network blog Stop and Move reports that Norm Allinder, the planning director for Madera County, told the Fresno Bee that such a development “doesn’t perpetuate the legacy of sprawl,” because it […]

Chicago Experimenting With the “Pedestrian Scramble”

|
We’ve been watching with interest the early days of the Emanuel-Klein administration. Transportation-wise, this team seems to be intent on moving Chicago forward a few decades in a few months’ time. Well, it’s been barely two weeks since we checked in on the Windy City, and they’re still building on the remarkable progress from earlier […]