$1,060: The Cost of Decrepit Infrastructure for Your Family Last Year

This chart shows delayed maintenance for infrastructure across modes and time periods. Image: ASCE

Five months’ groceries for a family of four. A year’s worth of textbooks for a college student. One thousand sixty dollars: That’s how much inadequate infrastructure spending cost the average American family last year, according to a new report from the American Society of Civil Engineers, “Failure to Act: The Economic Impact of Current Investment Trends in Surface Transportation Infrastructure.” And it’s only projected to get worse.

The country’s roads, bridges and transit systems are deteriorating, but because of the gradual and diffused nature of the problem, the economic effects aren’t easy to recognize, ASCE asserts.

But make no mistake: deferred maintenance costs American families and businesses dearly. Deteriorating roads do damage to private and commercial vehicles. Extra miles are driven to avoid congested roadways. Unreliable transit systems and commercial trucking routes force users to allot additional time in case of delay, undermining productivity.

All this added up to a four-figure price tag for the average U.S. family in 2010. That’s a total of $130 billion for American families and businesses last year alone.

Looking ahead, things could get much worse, engineers report. If spending levels are held constant, by 2020, businesses would pay an extra $430 billion in transportation costs, household incomes would fall by $7,000 and U.S. exports would fall by $28 billion. This would be a tremendous blow to the economy. By 2040, losses in efficiency related to transportation investment are expected to directly result in the loss of 400,000 jobs — and that’s if spending levels are held constant, not reduced by a third, as Rep. John Mica (R-FL) has proposed.

The desire to reduce infrastructure spending in the midst of a debt crisis is understandable, but it will only make the crisis far worse. “You run a deficit both when you borrow money and when you defer maintenance that needs to be done,” said former National Economics Council Director Larry Summers. “Either way, you’re imposing a cost on future generations.”

Plus, many experts warn that what would be a cheap fix now will be a costly overhaul if infrastructure is allowed to deteriorate beyond repair.

“This report should serve as a wake-up call to policy makers and politicians alike,” said former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, co-chair of Building America’s Future, a bi-partisan group dedicated to increasing investment in U.S. infrastructure. “The consequences of inaction are quite clear: Failure to make smart investments in our infrastructure will erode our nation’s economic competitiveness and leave an indelible mark on the quality of life for every American.”

  • Anonymous

    Why is streetblog promoting this garbage? The “study” is nothing more than a lobbying effort for more paving. As a regular bicyclist, I am certainly not paying $1060 per year in out-of-pocket costs due to congestion and potholes.

  • Charles_Siegel

    I’m not going to trust the Civil Engineers on this one.  They are ignoring induced demand.  Their numbers imply that building more freeways will save us money.

    When they say “Extra miles are driven to avoid congested roadways,” what they mean is that we should expand those roadways and build new roads – as if that would reduce congestion.

  • Bob Davis

    I would tend to take such estimates with the proverbial “grain of salt”, especially if they’re put forth by civil engineers, who might look upon infrastructure improvements as a source of jobs.  One of the major reasons for lack of interest in maintenance is what I call the “Golden Spike Mindset”–finish the project and assume it’s done for all time.  Replacing ties, keeping the track level (or replacing worn-out pavement or obsolete navigation systems) doesn’t provide the same photo ops that ground-breakings and ribbon cuttings do. 

  • Nat Hayes

    As a sober engineer, and ASCE member, I would suggest reading the report and not the few sentences of this blog entry to conclude on the soundness of the average cost to a family of four.

    ASCE has a membership of over 100,000 engineers across the country working in all disciplines, representing all stakeholders in public and private infrastructure during all project phases.

    Much of our reports are developed by members volunteering their time, and reference citations to support our statements are always provided in the reports.

    For example, read my school infrastructure report for Pennsylvania at pareportcard.org

    If you don’t accept thoughts on infrastructure from a civil engineer, then why would you accept a prescription from a physician for a medical condition?

  • Charles Marohn

    This is the ASCE press release. You should actually read the report. If you did that with even a modicum of skepticism, you would conclude that these findings are an embarrassment. Respected bloggers should not be the mouthpiece for ASCE.http://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2011/8/8/the-asce-infrastructure-cult.html


Streetsies 2011: Who’s Naughty, Who’s Nice?

Thanks for voting in the 2011 Streetsie award poll, where Streetsblog readers weigh in on the good, the bad, and the ugly of the year. Santa knows if you’ve been multimodal, and he knows if you’ve been using cost-effectiveness metrics and low-carbon forms of transportation, so price road use fairly for goodness’ sake! We start […]

A National Infrastructure Bank: Can the U.S. Learn From Europe?

On Labor Day, President Barack Obama gave a speech in which he pushed for the creation of a National Infrastructure Bank. Legislation that would establish the bank was introduced over the summer in Senate Bill 1926, authored by Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. But the idea of an independent financing entity […]

More Money Won’t Fix U.S. Infrastructure If We Don’t Change How It’s Spent

“America’s infrastructure is slowly falling apart” went the headline of a recent Vice Magazine story that epitomizes a certain line of thinking about how to fix the nation’s “infrastructure crisis.” The post showed a series of structurally deficient bridges and traffic-clogged interchanges intended to jolt readers into thinking we need to spend more on infrastructure. The idea […]