Complete Streets Bill Introduced in Senate

Complete streets provide safe spaces for all users, not just motorists. Photo: ##http://streetswiki.wikispaces.com/Complete+Streets##Streetswiki##

Earlier this week, 12 senators, led by Tom Harkin (D-IA), introduced the Complete Streets Act of 2011 (S.1056), a companion to the House bill we reported on a few weeks back. The purpose of the bills is to push states and metropolitan planning organizations to fully consider incorporating pedestrian and bicycle safety measures when roads are built or reconstructed.

Like the House version, the Senate bill [PDF] would require states and MPOs to craft and adhere to complete streets policies. It goes further than the House bill, however, in that it also requires agencies to consider cyclists, pedestrians, and transit when building roads with federal funds. Both bills have been weakened from a previous incarnation, however — they no longer carry penalties for noncompliance.

Complete streets are streets with safe places for everyone, whether they’re in a car, on foot, on a bicycle, or riding transit. Some “street treatments” that are used to make streets more complete are sidewalks, bike lanes, special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, and roundabouts, just to name a few.

Twenty-five states and more than 200 local jurisdictions have adopted Complete Streets policies. Every state except Maine, Nevada, Alaska and South Dakota has at least one city or town that has enacted a Complete Streets policy, according to a recent report [PDF]. According to the National Complete Streets Coalition:

The power of the Complete Streets movement is that it fundamentally redefines what a street is intended to do, what goals a transportation agency is going to meet, and how the community will spend its transportation money. It breaks down the traditional separation of “highways,” “transit,” and “biking/walking,” and instead focuses on the desired outcome of a transportation system that supports safe use of the roadway for everyone, by whatever means they are traveling.

The importance of the legislation is underscored by this week’s release of “Dangerous by Design,” a report by Transportation for America on pedestrian fatalities caused, many times, by streets designed without consideration for people on foot.

Bill sponsor Tom Harkin understands the connection between autocentric street design and health and safety. “In many places across the country, there is a complete lack of sidewalks and bike lanes,” said Sen. Harkin in a statement upon release of the legislation. “This not only makes our roadways more dangerous for pedestrians, it discourages people from being more active by walking or riding a bike.”

While complete streets advocates were able to get a Republican co-sponsor, Steve LaTourette, in the House, they had no such luck in the Senate. The only non-Democrat among the 12 co-sponsors is Independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

However, Republicans at the state and local level have supported such legislation, as do a wide range of organizations that have signed on. Here’s a list of supporters:

  • AARP
  • Alliance for Biking and Walking
  • America Bikes
  • America Walks
  • American Association for Health Education
  • American Planning Association
  • American Public Health Association
  • American Public Transportation Association
  • Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals
  • Bicycle Transportation Alliance
  • Defeat Diabetes Foundation
  • League of American Bicyclists
  • NARP
  • National Association of Area Agencies on Aging
  • National Association of Realtors
  • National Center for Walking and Biking
  • National Complete Streets Coalition
  • Paralyzed Veterans of America
  • Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
  • Safe Routes to School National Partnership
  • Sierra Club
  • Smart Growth America
  • Transportation Choices Coalition
  • Transportation for America
  • Trust for America’s Health
  • YMCA of the USA
  • Asdf

    As a supporter of bike lanes, here’s a quesiton: Why can’t we make bike lanes in NYC more attractive? 

    Quite frankly, when the PP anti-bike lane group complains that the bike lane is ugly. I do agree. I think it’s a fixable solution. 

    NYC has phenomenal design practices throughout the city. Why not get a designer/planner to develop a bike lane aesthetic so our bike lanes are not only usable but visually enhancing? This might convert the anti-bikers! 

  • Personally, I love those bright green lanes. But that might just be a pavlovian response (“safe place = good!”) It’s probably just because it’s too expensive – I’d love European style lanes that are extensions of sidewalks, with trees or wrought iron railing separating them from traffic, but that seems pretty unlikely in the current political and economic climate 🙁

  • You would think that as summer is coming upon us legislation like this would easily get support. Particularly when it will help create jobs and help people stay healthy. 

  • Judging by the photo and by the text of the bill, this is more a bike lane bill than a walkability bill. Only some of the issues involving walkability, such as sidewalks with
    adequate snow shoveling and tree cover sheltering from the sun, can be
    covered under such a general bill. The problem is that a street isn’t really walkable if it’s too wide for the traffic it has or has excessive setbacks; suburban roads with 40 meters building to building are not pedestrian-friendly no matter how nice the sidewalks are.

  • Clutch J

    @Alon Levy      You’re right: We don’t want federal legislation spelling out details such as how many trees we should plant per mile of sidewalk. Nevertheless, the complete streets legislation would place local walking advocates (and pro-walking transportation professionals within transportation agencies) around the country in a very strong position to negotiate high-quality walking facilities on every federal-aid transportation project.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

A Bill to Make American Streets Safer Surfaces in the Senate

|
Has the moment finally arrived for a national complete streets law? A bill creating incentives for transportation agencies to design safe streets for everyone — pedestrians and cyclists in addition to motorists — is back on the floor of Congress this week. Senators Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and Mark Begich (D-Alaska) are sponsoring the Safe Streets Act […]

Reps. Matsui, LaTourette Introduce Complete Streets Bill

|
A bill to provide Americans with more transportation choices than just driving is one step closer to becoming law. Reps. Doris Matsui (D-CA) and Steve LaTourette (R-OH) just introduced the Safe and Complete Streets Act of 2011 [PDF]. The bill doesn’t have a number yet. The bill mandates the consideration of the “safety and convenience” of […]

Flashback: Obama Once Led Push for ‘Complete Streets’

|
With Congress out of town on its Memorial Day break, the nation’s capital is a quiet place to be — but all of that will change next week, as the appearance of the House transportation bill is expected to kick off an intense battle to reshape federal policy on transit, bikes, roads and bridges. Before […]

Two-Year Transpo Bill Moves on to Full Senate Without Bike/Ped Protections

|
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate. Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so […]