Can Transit Expansion Produce Sprawl Like Highways Do?


Here in the Washington, D.C. area, our Metro system is expanding. A new Silver Line will go all the way to Dulles airport and beyond, into exurban Loudon County. The projected station stops are named for highways, not neighborhoods or landmarks: Reston Parkway, Route 28, Route 606, Route 772. Ten of the 11 new stations will be outside the Capital Beltway, almost doubling the number of metro stations outside the unofficial boundary of D.C.’s urban territory.

I’m always happy to see transit flourishing, and it will be nice to be able to take the metro all the way to Dulles without switching to the bus. But does transit expansion give the official thumbs-up to people moving farther and farther outside the urban core? This Silver Line isn’t being built to get me from the inner city to our ridiculously far-flung airport. It’s to provide all the benefits of transit – a reliable, congestion-free ride to work while you read the paper or doze off to your iTunes – to people who have chosen to live several counties away from their work.

Land use expert Reid Ewing, a professor of urban planning at the University of Utah and associate editor of the Journal of the American Planning Association, said transit leads to development – both sprawling and compact – because it improves accessibility. And increased accessibility to jobs in a shorter amount of time is an engine for development.

“It’s the fact that you can reach lots of trip attractions within short period of time on transit that causes development around the station,” Ewing said. “It doesn’t happen inherently. And accessibility, likewise, is a driving force in highway oriented sprawl.”

Different modes create development in different ways. Even different rail modes, Ewing said, have different potential to induce development. Light rail tends to go slower than heavy rail, and so light rail connectivity far out in the suburbs won’t be as much of a boon to a community as a faster line. So it won’t attract as many new residents to the area, whether people living in a tight circle around the station and walking to transit, or people living more spread out and driving there.

“With highway expansion you really don’t get much concentration of activity because the automobile is so flexible – it can go anywhere and it moves at fairly high speeds,” Ewing said. “The catchment area for a high performance highway is many miles. And that catchment area is likely to be developed in a sprawling pattern, because it’s auto-oriented. In the case of rail expansion, there’s at least potential to have concentrated transit oriented development around the station, then potentially sprawl feeding the station through park-and-ride.”

Park-n-ride at Fuqua station in Houston. Photo: ##http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/docs/houston/chapter2.htm##FHWA##

That’s why well-planned station area development so key. It doesn’t just make for nice, semi-urban enclaves – it channels outward development along compact corridors, says APTA President Bill Millar.

“We have a long, long history in the country of building compact towns around railroad stations,” Millar said. “We know that the value of land goes up around stations and intensity of development goes up around stations and that’s anti-sprawl.”

Besides, transit lines typically have to go through a cost-benefit analysis to acquire federal and state funding, and they need to demonstrate a certain level of projected ridership. “That is one reason why you don’t have trains to nowhere the way sometimes you have other things to nowhere,” said Sarah Kline of Reconnecting America.

Transit is generally built in response to outward development, in other words – it doesn’t cause it.

“It’s not like roads or highways that were built before these places really grew up,” Kline said. “The road gets built and then the suburb grows up and then all of a sudden no one can get into downtown anymore because it’s so congested, so they build transit. And yes, transit allows people to still live there. But what would happen if there weren’t transit? People wouldn’t all be moving in closer because there’s not enough affordable housing closer in.”

Chris Leinberger of Brookings and the University of Michigan writes extensively on the increasing demand for compact urban development. He says the lack of affordable inner-city housing Kline refers to is the product of the failure of real estate developers to adequately fill the enormous demand for compact, walkable neighborhoods. The high prices in the urban core signal the high demand in densely developed areas, according to Leinberger.

Does that mean even transit-oriented development on the fringe can be to the detriment of the city itself? The surging desire for walkability can be sated by little suburban downtowns dotted around the periphery instead of by the urban core, building up the suburbs at the expense of downtown. Here in D.C. for example: a person craving urbanism could go to Tysons or Reston or Rockville and contribute to the starvation of Washington, D.C. itself. The city’s census numbers showed a rise in population this year for the first time since 1950, but we still only have 75 percent of the population we had then. On the other hand, by relieving some of the pressure for compact neighborhoods, densely-built communities outside the city can have the effect of making housing more affordable inside the city.

Bill Millar says yes, transit lines stretch farther and farther out into the countryside, but it at least concentrates the development that’s occurring there anyway, and makes it more efficient. “Transit makes development more dense, more environmentally friendly, and increases the probability people will use car less,” he said.

But it can still be done wrong. Portland-area Congressman Earl Blumenauer said transit-oriented development can create walkable, livable communities, but “building nothing but a park-n-ride outside the station will create sprawl.”

Every transit line has some stations that fail this test – stations that are anchored in an ocean of parking, with no other services nearby. If there are no residential or commercial opportunities within walking distance of the station, no one will ever walk there. In these cases, transit is an engine for auto-oriented sprawl.

Back to the Silver Line:  Four of those 11 new stations will be in and around Tysons Corner, which has embarked on a land use plan to redevelop the sprawling, auto-oriented shopping destination suburb into a walkable urban center. The placement of transit stations there fits well with their plan to increase density and pedestrian-friendliness, and even without that plan, Tysons’ population justifies a transit line.

  • Neal

    To my mind, the Silver line has been mis-branded as the Dulles metro line. A rider coming from DC out to the airport will have a long ride. The Silver line is really the Tysons Corner metro, serving the Fairfax and Loudon communities that now only have surface roads and the Dulles Toll Road for access.

  • JS

    “to people who have chosen to live several counties away from their work.”

    Not really fair, given the size of Arlington County, and an assumption that a large proportion of the riders on the SIlver Line will be going to DC (more likely, they will be going to Tysons). Tysons is an enormous employment center as well as the Dulles Corridor (and is part of the reason that Fairfax and Loudoun boomed so much.

    Also, the simple reason is also housing prices. You can get a 2-3 bedroom townhouse in Loudoun or P William in a decent school district. You can’t touch that in Arlington, Alexandria, or DC – and I’m sorry, a lot of these jurisdictions just dont have the housing stock for a family. Most multiunit buildings don’t have 3 bedroom condos, and townhouse stock in a close in place like Arlington is ridiculously expensive)

  • Jack Love

    “to people who have chosen to live several counties away from their work.”

    I grow weary of reading this. Employment and housing are not perfect markets, and changing a job is as difficult, if not more so, than selling a home. I think it’s unfair to blame individuals for making the choices they do to live in a certain area without knowing all the facts.

    JS (Above) spoke of housing; I will briefly address employment. I believe many employers made a great mistake to locate their businesses along the Dulles Access Road (VA 267), where commuting requires a car. Likewise, the Army made a mistake to relocate so many employees to Ft Belvoir in that commuting wasteland of Southern Fairfax. These are the policies that must be addressed – what are governments doing that encourage employment centers in these areas?

  • Greg D.

    Metro should extend the Silver Line to Dulles Airport and no further. Scrap the last two stations out in low-density exurbia. Build the last station (at the airport terminal) underground, and don’t include any stub tunnels as to make expansion toward Loudoun difficult.

    The Silver Line should have gone to Tyson’s and stopped, but it’s too late now. The rail connection from Dulles to Tyson’s or to DC should have been regional rail, like Paris’s RER or London’s new Crossrail.

  • Nat

    Transit oriented development is culture dependent. Los Angeles at the turn of the 20th century grew outlying dense communities from it’s interurban system that the roads later filled in between. Conversely, in Pittsburgh – where Bill Millar is from – transit oriented development of the 1980s and 1990s hasn’t brought people back into the older, denser suburban communities in the South Hills nor has it reoriented the commercial corridors.

    Granted there are many variables to consider, but those are two broadly viewed examples I submit to show where the theory has worked and where it has not.

  • Through the aegis of recording, Crosby developed the techniques of
    constructing his broadcast radio programs with the same directorial
    tools and craftsmanship 
    that occurred in a theatrical motion picture production. This feat
    directly led the way to applying the same techniques to creating all
    radio broadcast programming as well as later television programming.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Transit Vote 2016: Atlanta May Finally Expand MARTA and Beef Up Bus Service

|
We continue our overview of what’s at stake in the big transit ballot initiatives this November with a look at Atlanta. Previous installments in this series examined Indianapolis, Seattle, and Detroit. Back in the 1970s, both Atlanta and Washington, D.C., received federal grants to build rail networks. After finishing the first wave of Metro construction, D.C. continued to invest, […]

Decades in the Works, D.C.’s Silver Line Opens to Commuters

|
Half a century ago, when Dulles International Airport was constructed in the farmlands of Virginia, planners were forming a blueprint for the Washington region’s new Metro system. Back then, they ruled out the idea of stretching the rail line 30 miles beyond the capital through rural counties to connect with the airport. Such a line […]

Transforming Tysons Corner: A High-Stakes Suburban Retrofit

|
“That strip mall just got rezoned for high rise buildings.” “These auto dealerships are going to disappear.” Those aren’t words you hear very often in suburbia, but if you’re hanging out in Tysons Corner, Virginia, you’d better get used to it. This office enclave, which sits dead center between Washington, DC and Dulles International Airport, […]

America’s “New” Rail Systems Are Showing Their Age

|
What should we make of the recent headline-grabbing service disruptions at Washington Metro and BART? This chart from Houston transit advocate Christof Spieler offers some important perspective. These transit systems are reaching the age where maintenance needs are increasingly urgent. Alex Block at City Block writes: BART, the snake digesting the mouse: Until seeing the data presented this way, I never appreciated how much of the […]

McCain’s Transit Hit List: Get the Details

|
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), a self-styled foe of what he labels wasteful government spending, has launched a broadside against transit projects in the U.S. DOT’s 2010 spending bill, which is slated for a vote this week in the upper chamber of Congress. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) (Photo: Scrape TV) McCain had proposed more than 20 […]