Senators Aim to Reintroduce Transportation Into Climate Bill Debate

MerkleyOilPlan.jpegSen. Jeff Merkley projects that his legislation would allow the United States to almost completely stop importing oil, primarily by reforming our transportation system. Image: Office of Sen. Merkley [PDF].

As the threat of a Republican filibuster continues to prevent the Senate from passing climate legislation, leading Democrats have tried to scale back their proposal in an attempt to peel off a few votes. In the process, serious attempts to put a price on carbon have fallen by the wayside, taking with them the best hope of reducing transportation emissions. A new bill introduced yesterday by Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley, however, aims to reintroduce transportation into the energy debate, if in a more limited form.

The Oil Independence Bill for a Stronger America, co-sponsored by Colorado’s Michael Bennet, Delaware’s Tom Carper, and New Mexico’s Tom Udall, sets an ambitious goal: completely halting imports of oil by 2030. Since transportation accounts for a full 70 percent of our oil use, that requires changing how the nation moves around.

Based on principles laid out last month, Merkley’s bill has four main components. First, it looks to improve the fuel efficiency of the transportation system we currently have. That means providing incentives for buying electric vehicles and charging infrastructure and setting ambitious new fuel efficiency standards for all vehicles.

Second, the Oil Independence Act would try to rebalance our transportation system away from reliance on the automobile. The bill includes Carper’s proposed CLEAN TEA program, which would require state Departments of Transportation and metropolitan planning organizations to set goals for how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and establishes a competitive grant program to fund exemplary projects.

Because Republicans are expected to filibuster a cap-and-trade system that includes transportation, however, the revenues that system would generate aren’t available to fund CLEAN TEA. Merkley’s bill only authorizes the spending for the grant program; it doesn’t actually allocate the funding, potentially leaving the program greatly weakened. 

The bill would also make transit tax benefits equal to parking benefits, permanently index them to inflation, and help shift freight movement onto trains and ships.

Third, the legislation offers support for the development of non-oil-based fuels, whether a next generation of biofuels or natural gas.

Finally, Merkley’s bill would try to lower home heating oil use by helping to provide financing for energy-efficient home retrofits.

Merkley’s legislation isn’t expected to move forward as a stand-alone bill. "It’s very much a marker for broader energy legislation," explained Stephanie Potts, a policy associate with Smart Growth America. As the Senate Democrats try and put forward a reworked energy bill, she explained, Merkley’s bill provides a way of airing new ideas and measuring their support. 

Because transportation accounts for a full third of American greenhouse gas emissions, serious climate legislation needs to tackle it in some way. Even so, said Potts, "it seems pretty certain that transportation fuels won’t be in an overall comprehensive cap at this point." If any sort of cap-and-trade scheme is included at all, she said, it will only cover utilities.

The Oil Independence Act, said Potts, includes policies that could significantly reduce the environmental impact of the transportation sector even in the absence of a price signal. Merkley’s office estimates that the bill could save 8.32 million barrels of oil each day by 2030, or 96 percent of our total imports.

Whether the Senate leadership embraces these policies will become clear very soon. An energy and climate bill is likely to be released on the week of July 26, according to Potts. 

  • Mrbadexample

    I wish green plans would stop assuming big oil savings from electric vehicles. constructing the new cars is still an oil-intensive process, and EV’s would be competing with wind turbines and solar panels for rare earth materials–and if we’re doing more with those, there may not be enough metals to do everything.

    I’d rather see movement toward retrofitting our communities for walkable shopping and mass transit. Our oil transportation consumption has a lot to do with our built environment, i.e., suburban sprawl.

  • gecko

    It is likely that accelerating environmental devastation will quite soon be the prime driver for dramatic positive change of the built environment.

    Since bicycle and derivative technologies provide highly practical and effective mobility solutions with many times less than one percent the environmental footprints of transportation systems based on cars — when all externalities are considered — it is long overdue that major advocacy and design and development efforts be based on this technology as a major critical path toward solving this rapidly emerging global life-threatening crisis.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

5 Down, 5 to Go: Plan Linking Transit to Climate Bill Wins Sponsors

|
Streetsblog Capitol Hill reported this week that the Obama administration — which often talks about reducing transportation-based emissions — is staying mum on a bill that would devote a guaranteed share of revenues from carbon regulation to transit, bike paths, and other green modes of transport. But that doesn’t mean the proposal, otherwise known as […]

Two-Year Transpo Bill Moves on to Full Senate Without Bike/Ped Protections

|
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate. Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so […]

Montana Dem Max Baucus to Chair Senate Transpo Subcommittee

|
We at Streetsblog have been saying that the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will be a key player in the transportation debate this session, counterbalancing the conservative House as they, together with the administration and the Senate Banking Committee, craft a six-year reauthorization. The EPW could play a key role in tempering House attempts […]