LaHood Answers GOP Critic, Soothes Dem Skeptic of Sustainability Budget

As Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood tangled with a senior GOP senator today over the White House’s $500 million-plus request for its inter-agency office of sustainable communities — a new project aimed at channeling federal energy towards local transit-oriented and smart growth plans — an influential Democrat joined her fellow senator in raising questions about diverting highway money to the effort.

3697794785_d3950d9796.jpgSen. Patty Murray (D-WA), center, talks to Transport Secretary Ray LaHood, at left. (Photo: WS DOT via Flickr)

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), chairman of the upper chamber’s transportation spending panel, praised the mission of the sustainability office but told LaHood she has "concerns about" the Obama administration’s pitch to send $200 million in Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding to the effort next year.

"I also have questions about how these proposals from [U.S.] DOT fit into our larger debate over" paying for the next long-term federal transportation bill, Murray said.

Murray’s measured assessment of the new alliance between LaHood, Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) focused on how federal officials would define the concept of "sustainability" as they determined how to dole out grants to local development plans.

But her Republican counterpart on the spending panel, Sen. Kit Bond (MO), took a harder line in challenging LaHood on the administration’s ability to positively influence on-the-ground urban and rural planning.

"I’m not as confident [as others] that trusting federal decision-makers in Washington to lead the process, to tell communities how they should grow, is the right way to go," Bond said, tangling with LaHood as he aligned with a road construction industry group that criticized the administration’s sustainability budget.

Sending that $200 million from highways — about one-two-hundredth of the FHWA’s annual budget — to the sustainable communities office "may reflect a view that we want to get rid of auto transportation," Bond said.

"The idea we’re giving up on [roads] or don’t care about the highways is nonsense," LaHood shot back. "People want other alternatives. We have a state-of-the-art interstate system. If people need more capacity, they can tell us that."

Bond’s reply was equally charged: "I’m telling you that."

Murray and Bond’s panel is charged with translating the White House budget request into annual spending legislation for the U.S. DOT and HUD. Congress ultimately approved the administration’s proposed $150 million in sustainability grants last year, but this year’s higher funding pitch could face a tougher path to passage amid the lack of progress on a new six-year federal transport bill.

Still, that continued reliance on extensions of existing transportation law — which have necessitated a transfer of more than $30 billion from the general Treasury to the highway trust fund since 2008 — gave LaHood ammunition against Bond and Murray’s complaint that road users would be ceding that $200 million in highway money to the sustainability office.

When lawmakers pay for transport programs from the general Treasury, LaHood said, "part of that money comes … from all
the taxpayers — who, in some instances, want something other than
roads. I have to put that on the record."

  • patrick

    right no LaHood!

  • patrick

    I meant “right on”

  • la rider

    It’s kind of nice to have someone on the peoples’ side rather than union lobbyists and the representatives they back.

    Most people realize that our transportation system is broken and building more roads is not the solution.

    When unions were originally created they were actually good, now they will be the downfall of our great state and country. Break the unions, they are an outdated concept that has lived way beyond it’s years.

  • mcas

    Bond’s absolutism sounds a lot like those stodgy men who ask, “Are you a vegetarian?” because they see you eating a salad. They can’t comprehend that you can *sometimes* want just a little less car/meat on your street/plate…

  • Erik G.

    “WashDOT”, if you please. Or WSDOT.

    Just never go to Seattle and say “The (Freeway Number)”; it identifies you as a Californian and the natives will descend on you like wolves.

  • norb

    I think this urban vs. rural thing is a false dichotomy, and Lahood et al need to have better points on this. Focusing resources better can protect and preserve rural areas from sprawl, and people living in rural cities and towns have growth issues themselves. And people in rural areas do bike and even use transit (e.g. the elderly). I’d be interested to see reporting on how these issues are being addressed by Lahood and Donovan. When you have people like Murray and Leahy starting to raise issues about rural areas, it really makes you think this is more about rural vs. urban than it is Dem vs. Rep.

  • Jason

    I agree that urban vs. rural is a false dichotamy. The sustainable communities can and should benefit rural areas and small towns.

    I think it is important to highlight sustainable transportation options that provide connectivity between people who reside in rural or outer suburban areas and jobs that may be in urban cores. Carpooling and vanpooling, for example,are critical for many of these commuters–for whom these are the only alternatives to SOV driving.

    Highlighting a few of these ideas into the sustainability initiative will help to innoculate it against the false charges that this program only benefits urban areas.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Economic Hardship Standard in Stimulus Sparks Washington Ferry Flap

|
The House transportation committee convened this morning to hash out the ongoing battle over federal policy-making, but Rep. Rick Larsen (D-WA) had a more local concern. How did Washington ferries manage to snag only 1 percent of stimulus aid? (Photo: city-data.com) Calling himself "an angry Norwegian," Larsen asked U.S. DOT undersecretary Roy Kienitz to explain […]

LaHood Faces Off With GOP Senator Over High-Speed Rail, Livability

|
When Cabinet secretaries appear in front of Congress’ appropriations committees, which control the annual budgets for each federal agency, the proceedings tend to be dry affairs dominated by local concerns and arcane fiscal debates. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) (Photo: Politico) But Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s visit with Senate appropriators today was anything but humdrum, as […]

A Federal Transportation Bill Is Coming… But When?

|
Speaking to members of the National Retail Federation earlier today, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood sidestepped what’s becoming one of the peskiest unanswered questions on the Hill: Will Congress delay the federal transportation bill until next year? In his address to the retailers’ group, LaHood stuck mostly to his department’s progress in allocating its $48 billion […]

Bicycle Advocates Thank LaHood, Talk Strategy

|
This was a big week for bike advocates: They had a pow-wow with Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, launched a new coalition, and refined their strategy for the 112th Congress. LaHood blogged about the meeting, encouraging bike advocates to stay engaged in the political process. He assured advocates that they “have a friend in the administration” but […]