Moody’s Gifts Fossil-Fuel States With Positive Credit Outlook

Picture1.pngComparing the falloff in state tax revenue to shifts in total unemployment. (Chart: Moody’s)

Credit-rating agencies — particularly Moody’s and S&P, the nation’s two premier shops — wield significant influence over the financial health of private companies. But state and local officials are often equally dependent on good credit ratings to borrow money for transportation and infrastructure improvements.

Even the federal government monitors its credit outlook to a degree that might surprise the average voter. When Moody’s suggested last month that the mounting deficit might imperil America’s AAA rating (the highest available), Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner leapt to the defense of Washington’s fiscal health.

So which states do credit raters believe are weathering the recession, and which will continue to struggle with yawning deficits that jeopardize their ability to invest in transportation and infrastructure? Bob Kurtter, manager of Moody’s state ratings team, addressed the question last month during a speech at New York University’s Institute of Public Knowledge.

Only two states, California and Illinois, have seen their credit downgraded in recent months, Kurtter said. Negative credit outlooks have been issued for 15 more states, and two are benefiting from positive credit outlooks: West Virginia and Louisiana.

Why are things looking rosy for those two governments?

"They got buffered on the early part of this downturn" thanks to their reliance on coal and oil production, Kurtter said. The two states "both have very conservative administrations that have managed pretty aggressively."

When states can reap credit gains by doubling down on fossil fuels, it’s easy to see why coal- and oil-state lawmakers are resisting legislative action on climate change. Take West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D), a longtime supporter of transportation reform who today proposed to block the Environmental Protection Agency from reining in emissions for two years — a delay twice as long as what many Republicans had endorsed.

  • I wouldn’t lend any money to the State of Illinois right now given simply the political and financial status of the state. Not sure the Illinois connection relates to transit at all, we are very coal reliant.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Moody’s: Future Is Bright for U.S. Transit Sector

|
Yes, federal funding for transportation is expected to go negative before Congress is even due to pass a new bill. And yes, transit systems had a tough few years, cutting service and raising fares as the recession took a bite out of revenues. But guess what? In a credit outlook report released this week, Moody’s […]

Moody’s Warns of Rising Debt Load for Toll Roads

|
Despite increased toll rates, toll roads saw their debt per roadway mile increase by a third last year, from $14.3 million in fiscal 2011 to $18.9 million in 2012. The average toll per transaction rose from $1.82 to $1.96 over the course of the last year. Moody’s warned in a press release last week that […]

Good News and Bad News: Obama’s Plan Would Work, But GOP Won’t Pass It

|
This morning brought some useful indicators about the outlook for President Obama’s jobs bill. Good news first: Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says President Obama’s job creation plan will likely add 1.9 million jobs, cut the unemployment rate by a percentage point, and grow the economy by 2 percent. The plan includes $50 billion for infrastructure, […]

True Story: Ratings Agency Pins Dangerous Roads on Car-Free Young People

|
The financial ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has a new report out that presents a bizarre theory about dangerous conditions on American streets. It’s the Millennials’ fault, “but not in the way you think,” they say. Prepare yourself for some ratings agency clickbait! Standard & Poor’s blames Millennials not only for the poor state of transportation infrastructure but also the […]