White House Economic Report Touts TIGER, High-Speed Rail, Transit

The White House Council of Economic Advisers’ first annual report under President Obama made headlines today for its gloomy job-creation outlook, but tucked inside its 462 pages is a tangible reflection of a changed outlook on transportation policy under the new administration.

NA_BE235_whecon_G_20100211182945.jpgTop White House economic adviser Christina Romer, at right, holds up yesterday’s report. (Photo: WSJ)

In a section entitled Rescuing the Economy From the Great Recession, for example, the president’s economic aides name-check a series of "Responsible Policies to Spur Job Creation."

One of those policies — which neither the House nor the Senate has chosen to add to their jobs bills this winter — is an expansion of the stimulus law’s merit-based TIGER grant program, which many transport reformers view as a step towards a leveling of the playing field between transit and roads. Here’s the relevant section of the White House report:

The experience of the Recovery Act suggests that spending on infrastructure is an effective way to put people back to work while creating lasting investments that raise future productivity. For this reason, the Administration is supporting an additional investment of up to $50 billion in roads, bridges, airports, transit, rail, and water projects. Funneling some of these funds through programs such as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program at the Department of Transportation, which is a competitive grant program, could offer a way to ensure that the projects with the highest returns receive top priority.

The economic report also touts the value of clean transport spending in its section on energy policies to aid adaptation to climate change.

"Investments in high-speed rail and public transit will increase energy efficiency by improving both access and reliability, thus making it possible for more people to switch to rail or public transit from autos or other less energy-efficient forms of transportation," the president’s advisers wrote.

Will this White House support, however buried it might be, help persuade congressional leaders to add more transit and rail aid to any jobs bill that comes down the pike?

The prospects appear dim for now in the Senate, where a measure outlined yesterday by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) focused solely on keeping the highway trust fund afloat until the end of the year, but Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has suggested that more infrastructure spending could emerge as part of a second small-scale jobs plan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), for her part, indicated in a statement today that she was not prepared to abandon the transportation provisions of her chamber’s jobs bill, which included $27.5 billion for highways and $8.4 billion for transit but no TIGER money.

"We will work to ensure that critical pieces of the [House jobs bill] are enacted into law – including investments
in our roads, bridges, and public transit systems," Pelosi said.

The biggest question mark, then, may be how long it takes the House and Senate to achieve a workable deal — and whether cash-strapped cities and local transit agencies can wait that long before imposing more service cuts and fare hikes.

  • stanleykowalski

    I’ll believe it when I see it. We spend 2% of the federal budget on transportation infrastructure and it shows. For the price of the war until Memorial Day we could pay for the entire California rail project. The hyped up Orlando-Tampa line is only the cost of our wars for a week.

  • While transportation infrastructure spending is an important way to create new jobs, we need to ensure that we keep public transportation jobs. Many representatives are asking Pelosi to increase the transportation provisions in the house jobs bill, which includes 10% flexible funding for operational costs, to $15 billion. Transportation Equity Network urges Congress to enact this flexible funding, which can protect states from making drastic service cuts and protect individuals from future layoffs, increased fares, and additional service cuts.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

White House Backs $50B For ‘Merit-Based Infrastructure Investment’

|
President Obama today threw his weight behind significant new transportation spending as part of a broad jobs bill taking shape in Congress, with $50 billion slated for transit, roads, bridges, and ports and the administration endorsing "merit-based infrastructure investment that leverages federal dollars." President Obama gave a high-profile jobs speech today. (Photo: NYT) During his […]

NTPP: Infrastructure Investment Will Only Boost the Economy If Done Right

|
At the federal level, we’re nearly flat out of transportation money and spending most of what’s left to stimulate highway construction jobs. It’s a double whammy that could present a bleak future for federally-funded transportation projects. A new report by the Bipartisan Policy Center’s National Transportation Policy Project (NTPP) challenges the country to envision a […]

Wall Street Bailout Money For Infrastructure? Maybe Not

|
President Obama will deliver a speech on job creation this morning in Washington, but one tactic that has won over quite a few Democrats of late — redirecting unspent money from last year’s financial bailout to transportation — may not be as possible as lawmakers had thought. White House economic adviser Larry Summers promised earlier […]

Obama Counters Gas Price Demagoguery With Commitment to Fracking

|
It’s been almost a year since the Obama administration released its Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future, but more importantly, it’s been two weeks since Energy Secretary Steven Chu got chewed out for not caring enough about lowering gas prices. And Newt Gingrich, whose presidential campaign is slipping into irrelevancy, can still do some political […]

CBO Echoes Obama’s Candor on the Pitfalls of ‘Shovel-Readiness’

|
During last month’s White House jobs summit, President Obama carved out some common ground with critics of his first stimulus law’s $47 billion in infrastructure spending — which was distributed mainly by the book through state DOTs. "The term "shovel-ready," let’s be honest here, doesn’t always live up to its billing," he acknowledged. The CBO […]