Klobuchar & Webb: Dems’ Unlikely Opponents of Bike-Ped Investment

Sen. Tom Coburn’s (R-OK) attempt to curb federal investment in bicycle and pedestrian paths, as well as other "transportation enhancements," was defeated on the Senate floor today — but it managed to pick up two unlikely Democratic supporters in the process.

87913182_Vrns4_M.jpgA college-age Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), with her father at right. (Photo: Klobuchar for Senate)

Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Jim Webb (D-VA) voted with Coburn to allow states to opt out of a current mandate to spend 10 percent of federal transportation aid on bike and pedestrian paths, bike-ped safety education, and other programs.

Coburn’s amendment fell short by a vote of 39-59, with three other Democrats, Sens. Russ Feingold (WI), Evan Bayh (IN), and Claire McCaskill (MO), also aligning with the majority of Republicans in favor of the opt-out.

Feingold, Bayh, and McCaskill are fiscal hawks who frequently vote to limit the scope of government spending, making their votes less surprising than Klobuchar and Webb’s — if just as disheartening for clean transportation advocacy groups.

Klobuchar in particular hails from a state where bicycling is a popular element of local culture. She has spoken often of her personal appreciation of biking, hiking, and other outdoor activities, and welcomed a 14-year-old climate activist to Washington after the young girl’s 1,500-mile bike ride.

Klobuchar’s office has not yet responded to an inquiry about her vote on Coburn’s two amendments to the Senate spending bill that funds U.S. DOT for next year. The second Coburn amendment that fell short today was a modified version of his earlier proposal to restrict all "transportation enhancements."

Even when limited to only block funding for transportation museums, however, the second Coburn plan was defeated on a 41-57 vote.

One GOP amendment that did make it into the DOT spending bill was Sen. Roger Wicker’s (R-MS) proposal to allow Amtrak riders to carry guns and ammunition locked in their checked baggage. Twenty-seven Democrats joined all 41 Republicans to approve the proposal.

Late Update: Webb’s vote was not cast in opposition to bike-ped spending, spokeswoman Jessica Smith said — she noted that several members of his staff are bicycle commuters and that he voted against Coburn’s second attempt to cut transportation spending today. Rather, Smith added, Webb’s vote on the first Coburn amendment was intended to give states more flexibility in their transportation budgets during the economic downturn.

Late Late Update: Klobuchar spokesman John Davis responds:

This vote was about giving states discretion as they face very
difficult economic times.  Senator Klobuchar has long supported and
will continue to support bike and pedestrian paths.  See, for example,
her vote to table Senate Amendment 2811 to the FY 2008 Transportation
bill, which would have cut out funding for bike paths.  Senator
Klobuchar would also like to move forward on a new transportation bill
which should include funding for roads, bridges, mass transit and bike
and pedestrian paths.

  • Doug

    I’d like to see continued Federal support for bike facilities. But, I can understand Klobuchar’s position: just because you like something doesn’t mean you expect the Feds to pay for it.

  • Um, yes it does. Go read the article again. The Feds (elected by us) already decided to spend 10% of Federal transportation funds (paid by us) on alternatives to driving (for us); Klobuchar wanted to actively block that in her state, and suck up the mandated alternative transit funds back into highways. WTF?

  • NattyB

    I’m surprised Elana didn’t bring this up following her mentioning of the Wicker Amendment:

    Great, we can now carry ammo on Amtrak. What about bikes? If you want to take a bike on a train in the NE Corrider on Amtrak, you have to put it in a frickin bike box. That frustrates the $hit out of me. But, great, we can bring ammo. Why are our Congresspeople so damn stupid.

  • NattyB

    RE: Mykle’s point

    Hmmm, why would a Senator opt out of funds for bikes and peds and plow those funds into highways?

    Rank speculation on my part, but, I would assume that their are certain favored road/highway developers that are also big campaign contributors. Follow the money. I wonder if propublica has anything on stuff like this?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Harry Reid Calls Bike Facilities “Absolutely Important”

|
Seems like bicycling heroes are coming out of the woodwork these days. I’d missed this in all the coverage of the extension, but was gratified to see that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s opposition to Sen. Coburn’s machinations weren’t just in the interest of smooth procedure. The man actually cares about bike/ped issues. From The […]

McCain & Coburn: Inadvertent Transportation Reformers?

|
Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) are no fans of dedicated federal spending on cleaner transportation. From bike and pedestrian safety to local transit funds, the duo has made a habit of attacking non-road projects as wasteful "pork." Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) (Composite Photo: City-Data.com) And yesterday was no exception, as McCain and […]

Two-Year Transpo Bill Moves on to Full Senate Without Bike/Ped Protections

|
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate. Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so […]

5 Down, 5 to Go: Plan Linking Transit to Climate Bill Wins Sponsors

|
Streetsblog Capitol Hill reported this week that the Obama administration — which often talks about reducing transportation-based emissions — is staying mum on a bill that would devote a guaranteed share of revenues from carbon regulation to transit, bike paths, and other green modes of transport. But that doesn’t mean the proposal, otherwise known as […]