EPA Chief Urges a More Urban Environmentalism to Fight Climate Change
With Congress returning to work next week after a month away from Washington, a national dialogue long dominated by health care is about to open to the long-awaited Senate debate on climate change.
"Big Oil and Dirty Coal, along with allies
like Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, and Newt Gingrich, are ramping up
their efforts to kill this legislation in the Senate," League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski wrote to his members today.
Over the years, environmentalism has largely been seen as an enclave of the privileged. The term "environmentalism" brings to mind pristine wilderness and wide-open landscapes. What doesn't come to mind is an apartment building, a city block, or an inner city kid who has trouble breathing on hot days. Even issues like climate change are distant concerns for poor and minority citizens (and their advocates) who are struggling daily for equality in education, health care and economic opportunity.
The word "transit" appears nowhere in Jackson's op-ed, but it's hard to think of a more appropriate issue than transportation to connect city residents with the impacts of climate change.
A study released last month by Columbia University's school of public health found that air pollutants have serious health consequences for children born to minority families in New York. Moreover, researchers from three California universities calculated earlier this year that toxic air would exacerbate the impact of heat waves on urban minorities, creating a "climate gap."
The congressional climate bill could take major strides to close that gap by investing in transit-oriented development and improving transit access for lower-income neighborhoods. But expanding environmentalism's reach into inner-city communities might be difficult given the Obama administration's current hands-off approach to transit's role in the legislation.