In Search of Stimulus on Capitol Hill

While many cautious economists are at pains to point out that the bulk of the funds in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — that is, the stimulus — have not yet been spent, others are arguing that the economy is significantly weaker than was expected when the bill was passed and a larger fiscal boost should be considered.

Paul Krugman lays out the case for an expanded stimulus today in his New York Times column, for example. Even some within the administration are on board. Just this week, Obama advisor Laura Tyson speculated that the stimulus was too small given the economy’s weakness, and new spending, focused on infrastructure, should be considered.

The problem with getting this done is political. Passing a large spending bill was no easy task the first time around. Now, with legislators occupied by health insurance and climate legislation, the administration is sure to be extremely reluctant to devote political capital to contentious fiscal stimulus packages.

Of course, stimulus is stimulus, whether or not it comes in a bill labeled "stimulus." Yesterday, Elana Schor reported on the status of the Senate’s version of the energy and climate bill, noting:

This was supposed to be a big week
for action on climate change in the Senate — but it’s ending with
Republicans rubbing their hands in glee as the Environment and Public
Works Committee delays its unveiling of legislation on carbon emissions…

Just two weeks ago, Boxer advised supporters of transportation reform to "work with me on my global warming bill" as she called for a quick rescue of the nation’s highway trust fund.

The highway account is expected to run dry in mid-August, sending Congress and the Obama administration scurrying to find $20 billion to keep state-level road projects funded until the end of 2010.

To summarize, the Senator is delaying climate legislation while Congress works to address the highway trust fund’s budget shortfall. Addressing the shortfall, in this case, means finding $20 billion in revenue somewhere in the budget.

But wait, you say. Why not simply deficit-fund the gap? That would be an additional $20 billion in stimulative oomph, and it would increase the size of the deficit by a mere 1 percent. What’s not to like?

Pay-as-you-go budget rules, also known as PAYGO, would appear to be the reason. Senators can stall any bill that doesn’t pay for itself by raising a point of order, and at any rate, the administration seems to be determined to prove its willingness to adhere to such rules.

There is a certain amount of logic to this. The administration doesn’t want to earn a reputation as a willy-nilly deficit spender, and it may be concerned about the effect of frequent violation of PAYGO rules on credit markets, which might sour on American debt.

At the same time, it seems absurd to allow funding problems to slow or derail important legislation while simultaneously worrying that current deficits aren’t big enough to pull the economy out of recession.

I think markets, and voters, would accept a formulation from the president that the Congress needn’t adhere to PAYGO when unemployment is above 9 percent. Instead we get this — scrupulous attempts to pay for everything on the one hand, and fretting about an insufficient stimulus on the other.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Less Than One Percent of Transpo Stimulus Money Paid Out So Far

|
The New York Times reports this morning that the Obama administration’s $787 billion economic stimulus package has hit a few snags: Some states and cities are beginning to complain that the money has yet to reach them. Others have been slow to get their paperwork to Washington; Virginia has yet to send the Transportation Department […]

Making the Connections on Stimulus Spending

|
Lots of news from the Streetsblog Network today, some good and some not so good. Design New Haven has a thought-provoking piece about a recent argument from the Congress for the New Urbanism on how to target stimulus funding : According to the CNU, priority stimulus funding should be given to projects that enhance connectivity […]

Dissenting Voices on Stimulus, on the Network and in Congress

|
The Streetsblog Network is continuing to digest the draft of stimulus legislation that came out of the House Appropriations Committee yesterday. We’re featuring a post from Design New Haven that offers a pretty tough evaluation: Despite all the evidence that transit-oriented development creates jobs by dramatically saving large numbers of people time and commuting expenses, […]

LaHood Reaches Out to Transit Industry, Lamenting ‘Lousy Economy’

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood sought to commiserate with the cash-strapped transit industry today, declaring the Obama administration an ally of local rail and bus agencies even as the "lousy economy" clouds prospects for passage of a new long-term federal transportation bill. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: Getty Images) In an address to the American Public […]